BBJP vs. BBUS
BBJP (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while BBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBJP returned 8.92%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBJP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
BBJP vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBJP achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.
BBJP
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 15.37%
- 6M
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 32.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
BBJP vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 15.37% | 26.55% | 7.47% | 20.65% | -17.24% | 1.21% | 15.42% | 11.38% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBJP and BBUS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.67 |
The correlation between BBJP and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBJP vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBJP
BBUS
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
BBJP
BBUS
Technology
BBJP
BBUS
Financial Services
BBJP
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
BBJP
BBUS
Communication Services
BBJP
BBUS
Healthcare
BBJP
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
BBJP
BBUS
Basic Materials
BBJP
BBUS
Real Estate
BBJP
BBUS
Utilities
BBJP
BBUS
Energy
BBJP
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBJP vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
BBJP
BBUS
BBJP vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBJP | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.42 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 3.00 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 13.76 | -5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBJP | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.33 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.79 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.84 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
BBJP vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBJP drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBJP and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBJP | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.66% | -35.35% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.60% | -9.21% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.49% | -19.01% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.66% | -25.46% | -7.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.74% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.53% | -5.46% | -3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 2.00% | +2.04% |
Volatility
BBJP vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that BBJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBJP | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 2.88% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.98% | 8.96% | +6.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.44% | 11.87% | +7.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.15% | 17.03% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 19.59% | -1.30% |
BBJP vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBJP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBJP vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
BBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 4.65% | 5.37% | 2.80% | 3.05% | 1.52% | 2.89% | 1.12% | 2.31% | 0.65% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBJP and BBUS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBJP has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBJP dropped -32.66% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 8.92% for BBJP. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBJP.
BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.
BBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBJP and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBJP and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer