PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBJP vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBJP vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBJP achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.


BBJP

1D
0.34%
1M
6.13%
YTD
15.37%
6M
17.26%
1Y
32.02%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBJP vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
15.37%26.55%7.47%20.65%-17.24%1.21%15.42%11.38%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BBJP and BBUS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.67

The correlation between BBJP and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBJP vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBJP
BBUS

Industrials

26.7%
7.2%

Technology

17.8%
37.1%

Financial Services

17.1%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.6%
9.4%

Communication Services

7.7%
10.8%

Healthcare

6.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.5%

Basic Materials

3.2%
1.2%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.7%

Utilities

1.3%
2.6%

Energy

1.0%
3.2%

Industrials

BBJP
26.7%
BBUS
7.2%

Technology

BBJP
17.8%
BBUS
37.1%

Financial Services

BBJP
17.1%
BBUS
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BBJP
12.6%
BBUS
9.4%

Communication Services

BBJP
7.7%
BBUS
10.8%

Healthcare

BBJP
6.1%
BBUS
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

BBJP
3.7%
BBUS
4.5%

Basic Materials

BBJP
3.2%
BBUS
1.2%

Real Estate

BBJP
2.7%
BBUS
1.7%

Utilities

BBJP
1.3%
BBUS
2.6%

Energy

BBJP
1.0%
BBUS
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBJP vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBJP
BBJP Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBJP vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBJPBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

3.00

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.95

13.76

-5.80

BBJP vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBJP and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBJPBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.33

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.79

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.84

-0.39

Drawdowns

BBJP vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBJP drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBJP and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBJPBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-35.35%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.60%

-9.21%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.49%

-19.01%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-25.46%

-7.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.74%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.53%

-5.46%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

2.00%

+2.04%

Volatility

BBJP vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that BBJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBJPBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

2.88%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

8.96%

+6.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.44%

11.87%

+7.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.15%

17.03%

+1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

19.59%

-1.30%

BBJP vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBJP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBJP vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

BBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
4.65%5.37%2.80%3.05%1.52%2.89%1.12%2.31%0.65%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBJP and BBUS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBJP has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBJP dropped -32.66% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 8.92% for BBJP. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBJP.

BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.

BBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBJP and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBJP and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer