BBIB vs. JMOM
BBIB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBIB is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bond (3-10 Y), while JMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBIB returned 3.31%/yr vs 26.72%/yr for JMOM. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBIB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JMOM.
Performance
BBIB vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBIB achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 17.91% return.
BBIB
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- -0.53%
- 1Y
- 3.01%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMOM
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 17.91%
- 6M
- 16.59%
- 1Y
- 31.46%
- 3Y*
- 26.72%
- 5Y*
- 15.34%
- 10Y*
- —
BBIB vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BBIB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF | -0.73% | 7.44% | 1.28% | 1.34% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 17.91% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 16.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBIB and JMOM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2023 | 0.10 |
The correlation between BBIB and JMOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BBIB vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBIB
JMOM
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
BBIB
JMOM
Basic Materials
BBIB
-
JMOM
Consumer Cyclical
BBIB
-
JMOM
Consumer Defensive
BBIB
-
JMOM
Energy
BBIB
-
JMOM
Financial Services
BBIB
-
JMOM
Healthcare
BBIB
-
JMOM
Industrials
BBIB
-
JMOM
Real Estate
BBIB
-
JMOM
Technology
BBIB
-
JMOM
Utilities
BBIB
-
JMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBIB vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank
BBIB
JMOM
BBIB vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBIB | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.38 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 4.02 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.17 | 18.80 | -15.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBIB | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 2.13 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.79 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
BBIB vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBIB drawdown since its inception was -6.36%, smaller than the maximum JMOM drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIB and JMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBIB | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.36% | -34.31% | +27.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -7.87% | +5.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.31% | -19.51% | +15.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -4.14% | +1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.68% | -6.31% | +4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 1.68% | -0.73% |
Volatility
BBIB vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) is 1.10%, while JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that BBIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBIB | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 5.98% | -4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.40% | 12.24% | -9.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.40% | 14.84% | -11.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.75% | 18.72% | -13.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.75% | 20.16% | -15.41% |
BBIB vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBIB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBIB vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison
BBIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than JMOM's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBIB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF | 3.93% | 3.95% | 3.76% | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.74% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBIB and JMOM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMOM has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to BBIB (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIB dropped -6.36% vs JMOM's -34.31%.
On 3-year performance, JMOM leads with 26.72% vs 3.31% for BBIB. On fees, BBIB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BBIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 26.72% return vs 3.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBIB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for JMOM.
BBIB has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 0.74% for JMOM.
BBIB is categorized as Government Bonds, while JMOM is Momentum. BBIB tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bond (3-10 Y), while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBIB and 0.12% for JMOM.
JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBIB and JMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer