PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBIB vs. JMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBIB vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIB achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 17.91% return.


BBIB

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
-0.53%
1Y
3.01%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
10Y*

JMOM

1D
-3.80%
1M
1.79%
YTD
17.91%
6M
16.59%
1Y
31.46%
3Y*
26.72%
5Y*
15.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIB vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BBIB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF
-0.73%7.44%1.28%1.34%
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
17.91%18.02%28.47%16.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BBIB and JMOM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2023

0.10

The correlation between BBIB and JMOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BBIB vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBIB
JMOM

Communication Services

99.8%
8.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.7%

Energy

-

3.8%

Financial Services

-

9.6%

Healthcare

-

8.7%

Industrials

-

12.8%

Real Estate

-

2.5%

Technology

-

38.1%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Communication Services

BBIB
99.8%
JMOM
8.3%

Basic Materials

BBIB

-

JMOM
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BBIB

-

JMOM
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

BBIB

-

JMOM
5.7%

Energy

BBIB

-

JMOM
3.8%

Financial Services

BBIB

-

JMOM
9.6%

Healthcare

BBIB

-

JMOM
8.7%

Industrials

BBIB

-

JMOM
12.8%

Real Estate

BBIB

-

JMOM
2.5%

Technology

BBIB

-

JMOM
38.1%

Utilities

BBIB

-

JMOM
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBIB vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIB
BBIB Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BBIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIB Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIB Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

JMOM
JMOM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
JMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIB vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBIBJMOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.38

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

4.02

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.17

18.80

-15.63

BBIB vs. JMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIB Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the JMOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIB and JMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBIBJMOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

2.13

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.79

-0.17

Drawdowns

BBIB vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIB drawdown since its inception was -6.36%, smaller than the maximum JMOM drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIB and JMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBIBJMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

-34.31%

+27.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-7.87%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.31%

-19.51%

+15.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-4.14%

+1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-6.31%

+4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.68%

-0.73%

Volatility

BBIB vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) is 1.10%, while JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that BBIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBIBJMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

5.98%

-4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.40%

12.24%

-9.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40%

14.84%

-11.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.75%

18.72%

-13.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.75%

20.16%

-15.41%

BBIB vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBIB vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison

BBIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than JMOM's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBIB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF
3.93%3.95%3.76%2.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.74%0.86%0.75%1.21%1.39%0.64%0.85%1.11%1.38%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBIB and JMOM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMOM has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to BBIB (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIB dropped -6.36% vs JMOM's -34.31%.

On 3-year performance, JMOM leads with 26.72% vs 3.31% for BBIB. On fees, BBIB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BBIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 26.72% return vs 3.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBIB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for JMOM.

BBIB has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 0.74% for JMOM.

BBIB is categorized as Government Bonds, while JMOM is Momentum. BBIB tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bond (3-10 Y), while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBIB and 0.12% for JMOM.

JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBIB and JMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer