BBIB vs. BBUS

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BBIB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBIB is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bond (3-10 Y), while BBUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBIB returned 3.66%/yr vs 20.89%/yr for BBUS. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBIB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.

Performance

BBIB vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIB achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 7.66% return.

BBIB

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 0.11%
• 6M: 0.10%
• 1Y: 2.94%
• 3Y*: 3.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBUS

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -2.04%
• YTD: 7.66%
• 6M: 6.35%
• 1Y: 21.50%
• 3Y*: 20.89%
• 5Y*: 12.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIB vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BBIB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF	0.11%	7.44%	1.28%	1.38%
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF	7.66%	17.77%	24.89%	16.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BBIB and BBUS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2023	0.12

The correlation between BBIB and BBUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BBIB vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIB

BBIB Risk / Return Rank: 24
BBIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BBIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BBIB Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BBIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BBIB Martin Ratio Rank: 23

BBUS

BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 59
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIB vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBIB	BBUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	1.73	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	2.37	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.31	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.05	2.34	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.81	10.25	-7.45

BBIB vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIB Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIB and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBIB vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIB drawdown since its inception was -6.36%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIB and BBUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBIB	BBUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.36%	-35.35%	+28.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.80%	-9.21%	+6.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.31%	-19.01%	+14.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	-3.39%	+1.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.68%	-5.43%	+3.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	2.10%	-1.05%

Volatility

BBIB vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) is 1.10%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that BBIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBIB	BBUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.10%	4.84%	-3.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.53%	9.86%	-7.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.40%	12.48%	-9.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.73%	17.13%	-12.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.73%	19.58%	-14.85%

BBIB vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BBIB vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

BBIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than BBUS's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBIB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF	3.90%	3.95%	3.76%	2.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF	1.03%	1.07%	1.21%	1.38%	1.57%	1.11%	1.43%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBIB and BBUS in my portfolio?

BBIB and BBUS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBIB or BBUS?

BBUS has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to BBIB (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIB dropped -6.36% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

Which ETF is better, BBIB or BBUS?

On 3-year performance, BBUS leads with 20.89% vs 3.66% for BBIB. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBIB or BBUS?

Over the 3-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 20.89% return vs 3.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBIB or BBUS?

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for BBIB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBIB or BBUS?

BBIB has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 1.03% for BBUS.

What is the main difference between BBIB and BBUS?

BBIB is categorized as Government Bonds, while BBUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. BBIB tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bond (3-10 Y), while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBIB and 0.02% for BBUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.