BBHL vs. VV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BBHL (BBH Select Large Cap ETF) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - BBHL tracks the Actively Managed while VV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBHL charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VV.

Performance

BBHL vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBHL achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than VV's 11.16% return.

BBHL

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 4.01%
• YTD: 6.39%
• 6M: 6.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VV

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.83%
• YTD: 11.16%
• 6M: 10.98%
• 1Y: 28.29%
• 3Y*: 22.94%
• 5Y*: 13.64%
• 10Y*: 15.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBHL vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF	6.39%	2.72%
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF	11.16%	2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BBHL and VV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

BBHL vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VV

VV Risk / Return Rank: 71
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 72
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBHL vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBHL	VV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.41	0.60	+0.82

Drawdowns

BBHL vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBHL drawdown since its inception was -11.99%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHL and VV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBHL	VV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.99%	-54.81%	+42.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.21%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.97%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.30%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	-6.84%	+3.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BBHL	VV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.71%	11.99%	+0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.71%	17.22%	-4.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.71%	18.19%	-5.48%

BBHL vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBHL has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBHL vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

BBHL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF	0.97%	1.08%	1.24%	1.41%	1.66%	1.19%	1.46%	1.81%	2.09%	1.75%	1.98%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBHL and VV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, BBHL and VV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BBHL or VV?

On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBHL or VV?

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BBHL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBHL or VV?

VV has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for BBHL.

What is the main difference between BBHL and VV?

BBHL tracks Actively Managed, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: BBH and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BBHL and 0.04% for VV.