BBHL vs. BBLU
BBHL (BBH Select Large Cap ETF) and BBLU (Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. BBHL is passively managed, while BBLU is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBHL charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBLU.
Performance
BBHL vs. BBLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBHL achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than BBLU's 10.68% return.
BBHL
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 6.39%
- 6M
- 6.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBLU
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 6.08%
- YTD
- 10.68%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 29.46%
- 3Y*
- 23.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBHL vs. BBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF | 6.39% | 2.72% |
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF | 10.68% | 1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHL and BBLU is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBHL vs. BBLU — Risk / Return Rank
BBHL
BBLU
BBHL vs. BBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL) and Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBHL | BBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.41 | 1.81 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
BBHL vs. BBLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBHL drawdown since its inception was -11.99%, smaller than the maximum BBLU drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHL and BBLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHL | BBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.99% | -17.20% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.41% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -1.98% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.81% | — |
Volatility
BBHL vs. BBLU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBHL | BBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.71% | 11.20% | +1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.71% | 14.53% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.71% | 14.53% | -1.82% |
BBHL vs. BBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBHL has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than BBLU's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBHL vs. BBLU - Dividend Comparison
BBHL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF | 1.13% | 1.25% | 1.39% | 1.68% | 32.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBHL and BBLU have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBLU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBLU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BBHL.
BBLU has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.00% for BBHL.
They also come from different issuers: BBH and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BBHL and 0.15% for BBLU.
Find the right allocation for BBHL and BBLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer