PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBCA vs. JMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBCA vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBCA achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 20.54% return.


BBCA

1D
0.50%
1M
3.24%
6M
10.32%
YTD
11.48%
1Y
31.11%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.28%

JMOM

1D
1.25%
1M
-1.61%
6M
16.11%
YTD
20.54%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
25.54%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.64M$22.26M$27.98M
$17.82M$11.76M$9.25M

BBCA vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BBCA
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
11.48%34.40%12.79%14.92%-12.53%28.16%6.20%28.93%-15.39%
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
20.54%18.02%28.47%22.89%-20.83%25.03%29.25%28.24%-12.55%

Correlation

The correlation between BBCA and JMOM is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2018

0.72

The correlation between BBCA and JMOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BBCA vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBCA
JMOM

Financial Services

41.4%
9.2%

Energy

17.6%
3.2%

Basic Materials

11.3%
1.2%

Industrials

9.2%
13.3%

Technology

7.0%
39.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
4.8%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Communication Services

0.4%
6.5%

Healthcare

0.2%
9.5%

Real Estate

0.2%
2.6%

Financial Services

BBCA
41.4%
JMOM
9.2%

Energy

BBCA
17.6%
JMOM
3.2%

Basic Materials

BBCA
11.3%
JMOM
1.2%

Industrials

BBCA
9.2%
JMOM
13.3%

Technology

BBCA
7.0%
JMOM
39.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BBCA
3.3%
JMOM
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

BBCA
3.1%
JMOM
4.8%

Utilities

BBCA
2.4%
JMOM
2.3%

Communication Services

BBCA
0.4%
JMOM
6.5%

Healthcare

BBCA
0.2%
JMOM
9.5%

Real Estate

BBCA
0.2%
JMOM
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBCA vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBCA
BBCA Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BBCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBCA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BBCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBCA Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

JMOM
JMOM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
JMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBCA vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBCAJMOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

3.66

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.88

13.51

+1.36

BBCA vs. JMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBCA Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the JMOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBCA and JMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBCA vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBCA drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than JMOM's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCA and JMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBCAJMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.81%

-34.31%

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-8.02%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.37%

-19.51%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.43%

-28.26%

+3.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-4.22%

+3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

-6.25%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.16%

-0.06%

Volatility

BBCA vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) is 3.05%, while JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that BBCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBCAJMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

5.42%

-2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

14.02%

-3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.82%

16.54%

-2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

19.00%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.00%

20.17%

-0.17%

BBCA vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBCA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBCA vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison

BBCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than JMOM's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBCA
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
1.72%1.83%2.36%2.51%2.65%2.17%2.41%2.32%1.21%0.00%
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.75%0.86%0.75%1.21%1.39%0.64%0.85%1.11%1.38%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBCA and JMOM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMOM has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to BBCA (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBCA dropped -42.81% vs JMOM's -34.31%.

On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 13.81% vs 12.37% for BBCA. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, BBCA has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 13.81% return vs 12.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBCA.

BBCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.75% for JMOM.

BBCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while JMOM is Momentum. BBCA tracks Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBCA and 0.12% for JMOM.

BBCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBCA and JMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer