PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBCA vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBCA vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBCA achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 7.57% return.


BBCA

1D
-0.69%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
7.18%
6M
6.09%
1Y
27.27%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-1.68%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
7.57%
6M
6.62%
1Y
22.78%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBCA vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBCA
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
7.18%34.40%12.79%14.92%-12.53%28.16%6.20%10.99%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
7.57%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BBCA and BBUS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.76

The correlation between BBCA and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBCA vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBCA
BBUS

Financial Services

39.2%
11.2%

Energy

17.9%
3.0%

Basic Materials

14.9%
1.2%

Industrials

9.7%
7.4%

Technology

8.4%
38.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
4.4%

Utilities

1.9%
2.6%

Communication Services

1.2%
10.0%

Healthcare

0.2%
8.0%

Real Estate

0.2%
1.7%

Financial Services

BBCA
39.2%
BBUS
11.2%

Energy

BBCA
17.9%
BBUS
3.0%

Basic Materials

BBCA
14.9%
BBUS
1.2%

Industrials

BBCA
9.7%
BBUS
7.4%

Technology

BBCA
8.4%
BBUS
38.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BBCA
3.6%
BBUS
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

BBCA
3.1%
BBUS
4.4%

Utilities

BBCA
1.9%
BBUS
2.6%

Communication Services

BBCA
1.2%
BBUS
10.0%

Healthcare

BBCA
0.2%
BBUS
8.0%

Real Estate

BBCA
0.2%
BBUS
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBCA vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBCA
BBCA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BBCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBCA Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
BBCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBCA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBCA vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBCABBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.49

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.15

10.97

+2.18

BBCA vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBCA and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBCA vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBCA drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCA and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBCABBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.81%

-35.35%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-9.21%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.77%

-19.01%

+6.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.43%

-25.46%

+1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-3.47%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-5.43%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

2.08%

0.00%

Volatility

BBCA vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) is 4.14%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that BBCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBCABBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

5.00%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

9.95%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.87%

12.59%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

17.14%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.11%

19.59%

+0.52%

BBCA vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBCA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBCA vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

BBCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than BBUS's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBCA
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
1.76%1.83%2.36%2.51%2.65%2.17%2.41%2.32%1.21%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBCA and BBUS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBUS has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to BBCA (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBCA dropped -42.81% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.52% vs 11.27% for BBCA. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBCA has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBCA.

BBCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.01% for BBUS.

BBCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. BBCA tracks Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBCA and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBCA and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer