BBCA vs. BBUS
BBCA (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBCA is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index, while BBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBCA returned 11.39%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBCA charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
BBCA vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBCA achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 10.60% return.
BBCA
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 12.76%
- 1Y
- 29.69%
- 3Y*
- 21.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
BBCA vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCA JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF | 8.72% | 34.40% | 12.79% | 14.92% | -12.53% | 28.16% | 6.20% | 10.30% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBCA and BBUS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.76 |
The correlation between BBCA and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBCA vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBCA
BBUS
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Financial Services
BBCA
BBUS
Energy
BBCA
BBUS
Basic Materials
BBCA
BBUS
Industrials
BBCA
BBUS
Technology
BBCA
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
BBCA
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
BBCA
BBUS
Utilities
BBCA
BBUS
Communication Services
BBCA
BBUS
Healthcare
BBCA
BBUS
Real Estate
BBCA
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBCA vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
BBCA
BBUS
BBCA vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBCA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 3.00 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 13.76 | +0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBCA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 2.33 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.79 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.84 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
BBCA vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBCA drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCA and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBCA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -35.35% | -7.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.43% | -9.21% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.77% | -19.01% | +6.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.43% | -25.46% | +1.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -0.74% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -5.46% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.00% | +0.04% |
Volatility
BBCA vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that BBCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBCA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 2.88% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | 8.96% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.49% | 11.87% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 17.03% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 19.59% | +0.55% |
BBCA vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBCA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBCA vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
BBCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCA JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF | 1.74% | 1.83% | 2.36% | 2.51% | 2.65% | 2.17% | 2.41% | 2.32% | 1.21% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCA and BBUS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBCA has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBCA dropped -42.81% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 11.39% for BBCA. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBCA.
BBCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.
BBCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. BBCA tracks Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBCA and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBCA and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer