BBBL vs. XCCC
BBBL (Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF) and XCCC (BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBBL is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 10+ Year Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XCCC is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BBBL returned 0.55% vs 2.89% for XCCC. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BBBL charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for XCCC.
Performance
BBBL vs. XCCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBBL achieves a -1.75% return, which is significantly lower than XCCC's -0.37% return.
BBBL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- 6M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- -1.75%
- 1Y
- 0.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.39%
XCCC
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.44K | $88.79K | $60.52K | |
| $3.06M | $5.79M | $10.07M |
BBBL vs. XCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF | -1.75% | 7.02% | 0.93% |
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | -0.37% | 7.25% | 13.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBBL and XCCC is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024 | 0.51 |
The correlation between BBBL and XCCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBBL vs. XCCC — Risk / Return Rank
BBBL
XCCC
BBBL vs. XCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) and BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBBL | XCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.10 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 0.57 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.22 | 1.82 | -1.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBBL vs. XCCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBBL drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum XCCC drawdown of -10.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBL and XCCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBBL | XCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -10.99% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.45% | -5.11% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | -1.37% | -3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -1.89% | -1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 1.60% | +0.87% |
Volatility
BBBL vs. XCCC - Volatility Comparison
Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) at 1.22%. This indicates that BBBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBBL | XCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 1.22% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.97% | 4.14% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.64% | 5.31% | +2.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 8.69% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 8.69% | +0.97% |
BBBL vs. XCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBBL has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XCCC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBBL vs. XCCC - Dividend Comparison
BBBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than XCCC's 10.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF | 5.92% | 5.77% | 5.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 10.25% | 10.06% | 10.68% | 12.05% | 7.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBBL and XCCC have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBBL has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to XCCC (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBL dropped -9.43% vs XCCC's -10.99%.
On 1-year performance, XCCC leads with 2.89% vs 0.55% for BBBL. On fees, BBBL is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XCCC has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XCCC has performed better with a 2.89% return vs 0.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBBL is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XCCC.
XCCC has the higher dividend yield at 10.25%, compared with 5.92% for BBBL.
BBBL is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while XCCC is High Yield Bonds. BBBL tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 10+ Year Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XCCC tracks ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBL and 0.40% for XCCC.
XCCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBBL and XCCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer