BBBL vs. CLOZ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BBBL (Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF) and CLOZ (Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBBL is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 10+ Year Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CLOZ is a CLO fund actively managed by Eldridge. BBBL is passively managed, while CLOZ is actively managed. Over the past year, BBBL returned 0.55% vs 6.00% for CLOZ. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BBBL charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CLOZ.

Performance

BBBL vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) and Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBBL achieves a -1.75% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 3.25% return.

BBBL

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -3.26%
• 6M: -2.49%
• YTD: -1.75%
• 1Y: 0.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.39%

CLOZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.23%
• 6M: 2.00%
• YTD: 3.25%
• 1Y: 6.00%
• 3Y*: 9.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF	$37.44K	$88.79K	$60.52K
CLOZ Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF	$9.15M	$11.73M	$8.72M

BBBL vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF	-1.75%	7.02%	0.93%
CLOZ Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF	3.25%	5.99%	10.55%

Correlation

The correlation between BBBL and CLOZ is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.12

Return for Risk

BBBL vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBBL

BBBL Risk / Return Rank: 12
BBBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
BBBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BBBL Omega Ratio Rank: 11
BBBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BBBL Martin Ratio Rank: 12

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 63
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBBL vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) and Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBBL	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	1.72	-1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.15	2.21	-2.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.43	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	1.54	-1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.22	5.12	-4.90

BBBL vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBBL and CLOZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBBL vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBBL drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBL and CLOZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBBL	CLOZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-5.32%	-4.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.45%	-3.90%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.77%	-0.02%	-4.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.26%	-0.37%	-2.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	1.17%	+1.30%

Volatility

BBBL vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ) at 0.66%. This indicates that BBBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBBL	CLOZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.09%	0.66%	+1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.97%	3.20%	+2.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.64%	3.50%	+4.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.66%	3.75%	+5.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.66%	3.75%	+5.91%

BBBL vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBBL has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBBL vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

BBBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than CLOZ's 7.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF	5.92%	5.77%	5.19%	0.00%
CLOZ Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF	7.30%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBBL and CLOZ in my portfolio?

BBBL and CLOZ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBBL or CLOZ?

BBBL has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to CLOZ (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBL dropped -9.43% vs CLOZ's -5.32%.

Which ETF is better, BBBL or CLOZ?

On 1-year performance, CLOZ leads with 6.00% vs 0.55% for BBBL. On fees, BBBL is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, CLOZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBBL or CLOZ?

Over the 1-year period, CLOZ has performed better with a 6.00% return vs 0.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBBL or CLOZ?

BBBL is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBBL or CLOZ?

CLOZ has the higher dividend yield at 7.30%, compared with 5.92% for BBBL.

What is the main difference between BBBL and CLOZ?

BBBL is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while CLOZ is CLO. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Eldridge. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBL and 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.