BBB vs. EAOA
BBB (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF) and EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - BBB tracks the S&P 500 and S&P Bitcoin 75/25 Blend Index while EAOA tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BBB returned 6.63% vs 24.37% for EAOA. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBB charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOA.
Performance
BBB vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBB achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than EAOA's 9.93% return.
BBB
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- -0.49%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOA
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 24.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
BBB vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BBB CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF | 0.99% | 9.73% | 38.82% | -0.24% |
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 9.93% | 18.41% | 13.79% | -0.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBB and EAOA is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2023 | 0.70 |
The correlation between BBB and EAOA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBB vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank
BBB
EAOA
BBB vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBB | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.41 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 3.00 | -2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.96 | 13.30 | -12.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBB | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 2.28 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.93 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
BBB vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBB drawdown since its inception was -21.98%, smaller than the maximum EAOA drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBB and EAOA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBB | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.98% | -25.06% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.74% | -8.17% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.16% | -0.71% | -5.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -5.31% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.94% | 1.84% | +5.10% |
Volatility
BBB vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison
CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) at 3.39%. This indicates that BBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBB | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 3.39% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.12% | 8.64% | +4.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 10.75% | +6.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 13.25% | +8.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 13.14% | +8.88% |
BBB vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBB has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBB vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison
BBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than EAOA's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBB CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF | 0.21% | 0.21% | 6.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 1.95% | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.93% | 1.48% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBB and EAOA have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBB has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to EAOA (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBB dropped -21.98% vs EAOA's -25.06%.
On 1-year performance, EAOA leads with 24.37% vs 6.63% for BBB. On fees, EAOA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOA has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EAOA has performed better with a 24.37% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for BBB.
EAOA has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.21% for BBB.
BBB tracks S&P 500 and S&P Bitcoin 75/25 Blend Index, while EAOA tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index. They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for BBB and 0.18% for EAOA.
EAOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBB and EAOA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer