BBB vs. EAOR
BBB (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF) and EAOR (iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - BBB tracks the S&P 500 and S&P Bitcoin 75/25 Blend Index while EAOR tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BBB returned 0.25% vs 15.21% for EAOR. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BBB charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOR.
Performance
BBB vs. EAOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBB achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than EAOR's 6.86% return.
BBB
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 1Y
- 0.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.95%
EAOR
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 1Y
- 15.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.02%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $66.52K | $79.94K | $49.31K | |
| $86.69K | $77.19K | $61.11K |
BBB vs. EAOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BBB CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF | -0.67% | 9.73% | 38.82% | -0.86% |
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 6.86% | 15.59% | 10.69% | -0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBB and EAOR is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2023 | 0.69 |
The correlation between BBB and EAOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBB vs. EAOR — Risk / Return Rank
BBB
EAOR
BBB vs. EAOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBB | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.29 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 2.23 | -2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 9.22 | -9.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBB vs. EAOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBB drawdown since its inception was -21.98%, roughly equal to the maximum EAOR drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBB and EAOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBB | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.98% | -22.91% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.74% | -6.62% | -11.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.70% | -1.24% | -6.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.61% | -4.95% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.60% | 1.59% | +6.01% |
Volatility
BBB vs. EAOR - Volatility Comparison
CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) at 2.67%. This indicates that BBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBB | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 2.67% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 7.78% | +5.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.18% | 9.30% | +8.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 10.64% | +11.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 10.41% | +11.34% |
BBB vs. EAOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBB has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOR's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBB vs. EAOR - Dividend Comparison
BBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than EAOR's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBB CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF | 0.16% | 0.21% | 6.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 2.38% | 2.45% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 1.99% | 1.39% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBB and EAOR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBB has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to EAOR (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBB dropped -21.98% vs EAOR's -22.91%.
On 1-year performance, EAOR leads with 15.21% vs 0.25% for BBB. On fees, EAOR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EAOR has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for BBB.
EAOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.16% for BBB.
BBB tracks S&P 500 and S&P Bitcoin 75/25 Blend Index, while EAOR tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index. They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for BBB and 0.18% for EAOR.
EAOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBB and EAOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer