PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BB.PA vs. EQNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BB.PA vs. EQNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Société BIC SA (BB.PA) and Equinor ASA (EQNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BB.PA is traded in EUR, while EQNR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EQNR values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BB.PA achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than EQNR's 64.97% return.


BB.PA

1D
0.55%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
11.37%
6M
20.75%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
-3.20%

EQNR

1D
-0.93%
1M
-7.43%
YTD
64.97%
6M
65.37%
1Y
62.59%
3Y*
18.67%
5Y*
20.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BB.PA vs. EQNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BB.PA
Société BIC SA
11.37%-14.73%8.29%2.78%40.56%5.34%-21.36%-26.84%9.74%
EQNR
Equinor ASA
64.97%-5.08%-10.43%-3.75%49.49%76.86%-20.70%1.24%-18.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BB.PA and EQNR is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BB.PA vs. EQNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BB.PA
BB.PA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BB.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BB.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BB.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BB.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BB.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

EQNR
EQNR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EQNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQNR Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EQNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BB.PA vs. EQNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Société BIC SA (BB.PA) and Equinor ASA (EQNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BB.PAEQNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.29

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

3.21

-2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.69

5.46

-4.77

BB.PA vs. EQNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BB.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the EQNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BB.PA and EQNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BB.PAEQNRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

1.69

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.59

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.31

-0.02

Drawdowns

BB.PA vs. EQNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BB.PA drawdown since its inception was -69.93%, which is greater than EQNR's maximum drawdown of -64.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BB.PA and EQNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BB.PAEQNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.93%

-64.43%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.88%

-19.57%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.92%

-29.06%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.92%

-39.98%

+12.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.19%

-11.47%

-33.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.36%

-23.84%

-5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.73%

11.51%

-4.78%

Volatility

BB.PA vs. EQNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Société BIC SA (BB.PA) is 3.69%, while Equinor ASA (EQNR) has a volatility of 14.27%. This indicates that BB.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BB.PAEQNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

14.27%

-10.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.89%

30.85%

-15.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.28%

37.24%

-14.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.10%

33.89%

-10.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.84%

36.39%

-11.55%

Dividends

BB.PA vs. EQNR - Dividend Comparison

BB.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than EQNR's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BB.PA
Société BIC SA
4.36%5.98%6.69%4.07%3.36%3.80%5.30%5.56%3.87%3.76%1.94%1.88%
EQNR
Equinor ASA
3.98%7.66%12.66%11.38%3.30%2.13%4.32%5.07%3.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BB.PA vs. EQNR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Société BIC SA and Equinor ASA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. BB.PA values in EUR, EQNR values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BB.PA and EQNR have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BB.PA and EQNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer