PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BB.PA vs. REN.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BB.PA vs. REN.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Société BIC SA (BB.PA) and Relx PLC (REN.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BB.PA achieves a 21.50% return, which is significantly higher than REN.AS's -12.74% return. Over the past 10 years, BB.PA has underperformed REN.AS with an annualized return of -3.24%, while REN.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 8.81% annualized return.


BB.PA

1D
-1.80%
1M
3.45%
6M
18.51%
YTD
21.50%
1Y
15.87%
3Y*
10.58%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
-3.24%
ALL TIME*
4.86%

REN.AS

1D
1.16%
1M
7.92%
6M
-13.09%
YTD
-12.74%
1Y
-33.40%
3Y*
1.51%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
8.81%
ALL TIME*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BB.PA vs. REN.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BB.PA
Société BIC SA
21.50%-14.73%8.29%2.78%40.56%5.34%-21.36%-26.84%1.35%-26.74%
REN.AS
Relx PLC
-12.74%-19.39%24.22%41.61%-7.50%45.80%-8.46%27.64%-3.83%22.84%

Correlation

The correlation between BB.PA and REN.AS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2007

0.29

The correlation between BB.PA and REN.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BB.PA vs. REN.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BB.PA
BB.PA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BB.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BB.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BB.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
BB.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BB.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

REN.AS
REN.AS Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
REN.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REN.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
REN.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
REN.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
REN.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BB.PA vs. REN.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Société BIC SA (BB.PA) and Relx PLC (REN.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BB.PAREN.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.82

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

-0.68

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

-1.17

+3.69

BB.PA vs. REN.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BB.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the REN.AS Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BB.PA and REN.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BB.PA vs. REN.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BB.PA drawdown since its inception was -69.70%, which is greater than REN.AS's maximum drawdown of -52.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BB.PA and REN.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BB.PAREN.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.70%

-52.14%

-17.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.27%

-48.66%

+33.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.92%

-52.14%

+24.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.92%

-52.14%

+24.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.03%

-52.14%

-12.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.76%

-38.05%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.80%

-13.31%

-16.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.25%

28.46%

-22.21%

Volatility

BB.PA vs. REN.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Société BIC SA (BB.PA) is 6.40%, while Relx PLC (REN.AS) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that BB.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REN.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BB.PAREN.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

6.96%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.66%

29.01%

-13.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.42%

32.36%

-10.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.09%

22.21%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.83%

22.01%

+2.82%

Dividends

BB.PA vs. REN.AS - Dividend Comparison

BB.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than REN.AS's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BB.PA
Société BIC SA
4.00%5.98%6.69%4.07%3.36%3.80%5.30%5.56%3.87%3.76%2.63%1.88%
REN.AS
Relx PLC
2.65%2.13%1.61%1.79%2.29%1.92%2.59%1.93%2.54%2.26%2.56%2.57%

Financials

BB.PA vs. REN.AS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Société BIC SA and Relx PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BB.PA and REN.AS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BB.PA and REN.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer