BATG.DE vs. DBJP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BATG.DE (L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - BATG.DE tracks the Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Japan while DBJP tracks the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BATG.DE charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBJP.

Performance

BATG.DE vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BATG.DE is traded in EUR, while DBJP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DBJP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

BATG.DE

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBJP

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: 3.64%
• YTD: 18.96%
• 6M: 19.61%
• 1Y: 48.58%
• 3Y*: 23.87%
• 5Y*: 21.98%
• 10Y*: 15.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATG.DE vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BATG.DE L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF	0.00%	5.88%	12.80%	12.76%	1.17%
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	18.96%	14.14%	33.82%	32.12%	-8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BATG.DE and DBJP is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022	0.45

Return for Risk

BATG.DE vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBJP

DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 84
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 81
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATG.DE vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BATG.DE	DBJP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.69	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BATG.DE	DBJP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-32.54%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.53%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-2.72%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.21%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BATG.DE	DBJP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	19.23%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	19.93%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	20.85%	—

BATG.DE vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATG.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

BATG.DE vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison

BATG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BATG.DE L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	2.41%	2.81%	2.80%	5.21%	0.80%	2.30%	2.53%	2.56%	3.87%	2.07%	1.13%	5.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BATG.DE and DBJP in my portfolio?

BATG.DE and DBJP have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BATG.DE or DBJP?

On fees, BATG.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BATG.DE or DBJP?

BATG.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.

What is the main difference between BATG.DE and DBJP?

BATG.DE tracks Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Japan, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for BATG.DE and 0.45% for DBJP.