BATG.DE vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
BATG.DE and VT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BATG.DE is a passively managed fund by LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited that tracks the performance of the Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Japan. It was launched on Oct 20, 2022. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both BATG.DE and VT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BATG.DE vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BATG.DE vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATG.DE L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF | 0.00% | 5.88% | 12.80% | 12.76% | 1.17% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 0.79% | 7.90% | 24.18% | 18.36% | -2.81% |
Different Trading Currencies
BATG.DE is traded in EUR, while VT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
BATG.DE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BATG.DE vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BATG.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BATG.DE vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
BATG.DE
VT
BATG.DE vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BATG.DE | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.53 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between BATG.DE and VT is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BATG.DE vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
BATG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATG.DE L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.80% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Drawdowns
BATG.DE vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATG.DE | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -50.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -6.19% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.08% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.60% | — |
Volatility
BATG.DE vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BATG.DE | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 18.76% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 14.99% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 17.10% | — |