PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BATG.DE vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BATG.DE vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BATG.DE vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BATG.DE
L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF
0.00%5.88%12.80%12.76%1.17%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
0.79%7.90%24.18%18.36%-2.81%
Different Trading Currencies

BATG.DE is traded in EUR, while VT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


BATG.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VT

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.42%
YTD
0.79%
6M
3.09%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
11.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BATG.DE vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATG.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BATG.DE vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATG.DE

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATG.DE vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BATG.DE vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BATG.DEVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

Correlation

The correlation between BATG.DE and VT is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BATG.DE vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

BATG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATG.DE
L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.80%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Drawdowns

BATG.DE vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BATG.DEVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

Volatility

BATG.DE vs. VT - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BATG.DEVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%