BATG.DE vs. BATF.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE).

BATG.DE and BATF.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BATG.DE is a passively managed fund by LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited that tracks the performance of the Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Japan. It was launched on Oct 20, 2022. BATF.DE is a passively managed fund by LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited that tracks the performance of the Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Pacific ex Japan. It was launched on Oct 20, 2022. Both BATG.DE and BATF.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BATG.DE vs. BATF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BATG.DE vs. BATF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BATG.DE L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF	0.00%	5.88%	12.80%	12.76%	1.17%
BATF.DE L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF	3.63%	8.25%	10.50%	-0.71%	5.08%

Returns By Period

BATG.DE

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BATF.DE

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: -4.02%
• YTD: 3.63%
• 6M: 2.64%
• 1Y: 14.12%
• 3Y*: 7.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATG.DE vs. BATF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BATG.DE and BATF.DE have an expense ratio of 0.16%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

BATG.DE

L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF

BATF.DE

L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF

Return for Risk

BATG.DE vs. BATF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATF.DE

BATF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 47
BATF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
BATF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
BATF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 45
BATF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
BATF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATG.DE vs. BATF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BATG.DE	BATF.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.55	—

Correlation

The correlation between BATG.DE and BATF.DE is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BATG.DE vs. BATF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BATG.DE nor BATF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BATG.DE	BATF.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-18.62%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-4.92%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.70%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BATG.DE	BATF.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.78%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	15.75%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	14.44%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	14.44%	—