BASV vs. BAIV

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BASV (Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF) and BAIV (Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BASV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory, while BAIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Brown Advisory. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BASV charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BAIV.

Performance

BASV vs. BAIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) and Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF (BAIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BASV

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 1.80%
• 6M: 8.55%
• YTD: 11.01%
• 1Y: 18.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAIV

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 2.55%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BASV vs. BAIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BASV Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF	7.94%
BAIV Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF	4.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BASV and BAIV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026	0.65

Return for Risk

BASV vs. BAIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BASV

BASV Risk / Return Rank: 49
BASV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BASV Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
BASV Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BASV Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BASV Martin Ratio Rank: 52

BAIV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BASV vs. BAIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) and Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF (BAIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BASV	BAIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.99	—	—

Drawdowns

BASV vs. BAIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BASV drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum BAIV drawdown of -11.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BASV and BAIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BASV	BAIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-11.41%	+1.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	0.00%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.59%	-3.28%	+1.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BASV	BAIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.43%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.86%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.82%	17.87%	-4.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.55%	17.87%	-4.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.55%	17.87%	-4.32%

BASV vs. BAIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BASV has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than BAIV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BASV vs. BAIV - Dividend Comparison

BASV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while BAIV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BAIV Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF	0.00%	0.00%
BASV Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF	0.37%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BASV and BAIV in my portfolio?

BASV and BAIV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BASV or BAIV?

On fees, BAIV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BASV or BAIV?

BAIV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BASV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BASV or BAIV?

BASV has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for BAIV.

What is the main difference between BASV and BAIV?

BASV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BAIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BASV and 0.60% for BAIV.