BASV vs. BAFE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BASV (Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF) and BAFE (Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BASV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory, while BAFE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Brown Advisory. Over the past year, BASV returned 20.72% vs 11.98% for BAFE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BASV charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for BAFE.

Performance

BASV vs. BAFE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) and Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BASV achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly higher than BAFE's 4.10% return.

BASV

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 4.84%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 6M: 8.35%
• 1Y: 20.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAFE

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 4.10%
• 6M: 3.47%
• 1Y: 11.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BASV vs. BAFE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BASV Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF	9.54%	10.32%
BAFE Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF	4.10%	7.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BASV and BAFE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025	0.76

The correlation between BASV and BAFE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BASV vs. BAFE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BASV

BASV Risk / Return Rank: 48
BASV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
BASV Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
BASV Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BASV Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BASV Martin Ratio Rank: 50

BAFE

BAFE Risk / Return Rank: 25
BAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
BAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 25
BAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
BAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BASV vs. BAFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) and Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BASV	BAFE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	0.89	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	1.31	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.16	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	0.94	+1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.81	3.37	+4.45

BASV vs. BAFE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BASV Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the BAFE Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BASV and BAFE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BASV vs. BAFE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BASV drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum BAFE drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BASV and BAFE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BASV	BAFE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-18.37%	+8.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.43%	-12.73%	+3.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-2.70%	+2.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-3.33%	+1.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	3.57%	-0.91%

Volatility

BASV vs. BAFE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) is 4.35%, while Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that BASV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAFE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BASV	BAFE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	4.75%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.01%	10.55%	+0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.83%	13.47%	+0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.75%	17.51%	-3.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.75%	17.51%	-3.76%

BASV vs. BAFE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BASV has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than BAFE's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

BASV vs. BAFE - Dividend Comparison

BASV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than BAFE's 0.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BAFE Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF	0.28%	0.30%	0.06%
BASV Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF	0.38%	0.41%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BASV and BAFE in my portfolio?

BASV and BAFE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BASV or BAFE?

BAFE has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to BASV (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BASV dropped -9.43% vs BAFE's -18.37%.

Which ETF is better, BASV or BAFE?

On 1-year performance, BASV leads with 20.72% vs 11.98% for BAFE. On fees, BAFE is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, BASV has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BASV or BAFE?

Over the 1-year period, BASV has performed better with a 20.72% return vs 11.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BASV or BAFE?

BAFE is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BASV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BASV or BAFE?

BASV has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.28% for BAFE.

What is the main difference between BASV and BAFE?

BASV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BAFE is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BASV and 0.54% for BAFE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BASV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.