BASG vs. CCOR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BASG (Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, BASG returned 2.81% vs -3.86% for CCOR. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. BASG charges 0.61%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

BASG vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BASG achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -2.72% return.

BASG

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 6M: -1.27%
• 1Y: 2.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCOR

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: -2.72%
• 6M: -2.94%
• 1Y: -3.86%
• 3Y*: -1.69%
• 5Y*: -1.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BASG vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BASG Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF	-0.02%	1.93%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	-2.72%	-2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between BASG and CCOR is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025	-0.02

Return for Risk

BASG vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BASG

BASG Risk / Return Rank: 11
BASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
BASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BASG Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BASG Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 5
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BASG vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BASG	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	-0.51	+0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.34	-0.66	+1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	0.92	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.15	-0.44	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.38	-0.94	+1.32

BASG vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BASG Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BASG and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BASG vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BASG drawdown since its inception was -19.30%, smaller than the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BASG and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BASG	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.30%	-22.99%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.30%	-8.79%	-10.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.09%	-19.21%	+13.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.75%	-7.35%	+1.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.46%	4.10%	+3.36%

Volatility

BASG vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 3.51%. This indicates that BASG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BASG	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.01%	3.51%	+3.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.01%	5.62%	+8.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.19%	7.56%	+9.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.07%	11.15%	+5.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.07%	10.77%	+6.30%

BASG vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BASG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

BASG vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

BASG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BASG Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.02%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BASG and CCOR in my portfolio?

BASG and CCOR have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BASG or CCOR?

BASG has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to CCOR (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BASG dropped -19.30% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

Which ETF is better, BASG or CCOR?

On 1-year performance, BASG leads with 2.81% vs -3.86% for CCOR. On fees, BASG is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BASG or CCOR?

Over the 1-year period, BASG has performed better with a 2.81% return vs -3.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BASG or CCOR?

BASG is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BASG or CCOR?

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for BASG.

What is the main difference between BASG and CCOR?

They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for BASG and 1.09% for CCOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BASG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.