BAR vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAR is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. BAR is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, BAR returned 20.98% vs 266.72% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. BAR charges 0.17%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

BAR vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAR achieves a -6.10% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -31.90% return.

BAR

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -3.79%
• 6M: -11.69%
• YTD: -6.10%
• 1Y: 20.98%
• 3Y*: 27.28%
• 5Y*: 17.06%
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: -11.25%
• 1M: 29.92%
• 6M: -7.52%
• YTD: -31.90%
• 1Y: 266.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAR vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust	-6.10%	64.12%	2.13%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-31.90%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BAR and MSTZ is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.16

Return for Risk

BAR vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAR

BAR Risk / Return Rank: 24
BAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
BAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
BAR Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
BAR Martin Ratio Rank: 21

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 65
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAR vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAR	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	1.81	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	2.41	-1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.31	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.81	3.16	-2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.95	6.14	-4.19

BAR vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAR and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAR vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAR drawdown since its inception was -26.15%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAR and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAR	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.15%	-99.38%	+73.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.15%	-84.89%	+58.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.94%	-97.68%	+72.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.64%	-94.54%	+87.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.78%	43.66%	-32.88%

Volatility

BAR vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) is 6.92%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 57.19%. This indicates that BAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAR	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.92%	57.19%	-50.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.05%	135.18%	-111.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.73%	148.74%	-121.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.29%	171.04%	-152.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.59%	171.04%	-154.45%

BAR vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAR has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAR vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither BAR nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAR and MSTZ in my portfolio?

BAR and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAR or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (57.19%) compared to BAR (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAR dropped -26.15% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, BAR or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 266.72% vs 20.98% for BAR. On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, BAR has been the lower-risk option at 6.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAR or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 266.72% return vs 20.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAR or MSTZ?

BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAR or MSTZ?

BAR and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BAR and MSTZ?

BAR is categorized as Gold, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for BAR and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.