PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BAR vs. IAUM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BARIAUM
YTD Return26.97%26.94%
1Y Return35.20%35.21%
3Y Return (Ann)11.86%11.97%
Sharpe Ratio2.312.31
Sortino Ratio3.063.06
Omega Ratio1.401.40
Calmar Ratio5.105.66
Martin Ratio15.2615.24
Ulcer Index2.22%2.22%
Daily Std Dev14.63%14.62%
Max Drawdown-21.53%-20.87%
Current Drawdown-5.89%-5.97%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between BAR and IAUM is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

BAR vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BAR having a 26.97% return and IAUM slightly lower at 26.94%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.17%
11.13%
BAR
IAUM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAR vs. IAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAR has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


BAR
GraniteShares Gold Shares
Expense ratio chart for BAR: current value at 0.17% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.17%
Expense ratio chart for IAUM: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAR vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR) and iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAR, currently valued at 2.31, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAR, currently valued at 3.06, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BAR, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAR, currently valued at 5.73, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.005.73
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BAR, currently valued at 15.26, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0015.26
IAUM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IAUM, currently valued at 2.31, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IAUM, currently valued at 3.06, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IAUM, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IAUM, currently valued at 5.66, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.005.66
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IAUM, currently valued at 15.24, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0015.24

BAR vs. IAUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAR Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the IAUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAR and IAUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.31
2.31
BAR
IAUM

Dividends

BAR vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison

Neither BAR nor IAUM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BAR vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAR drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, roughly equal to the maximum IAUM drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAR and IAUM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.89%
-5.97%
BAR
IAUM

Volatility

BAR vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR) and iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest (IAUM) have volatilities of 5.38% and 5.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.38%
5.26%
BAR
IAUM