BAR vs. IAUM
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR) and iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest (IAUM).
BAR and IAUM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BAR is a passively managed fund by GraniteShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on Aug 31, 2017. IAUM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on Jun 15, 2021. Both BAR and IAUM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BAR or IAUM.
Performance
BAR vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BAR having a 29.28% return and IAUM slightly higher at 29.37%.
BAR
29.28%
-2.84%
14.46%
33.91%
12.62%
N/A
IAUM
29.37%
-2.77%
14.57%
34.05%
N/A
N/A
Key characteristics
| BAR | IAUM | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.27 | 2.27 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.02 | 3.03 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.39 | 1.39 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.16 | 4.14 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.34 | 13.37 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.50% | 2.51% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.74% | 14.74% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.53% | -20.87% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.18% | -4.17% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAR vs. IAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAR has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between BAR and IAUM is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BAR vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR) and iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BAR vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison
Neither BAR nor IAUM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BAR vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAR drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, roughly equal to the maximum IAUM drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAR and IAUM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BAR vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR) and iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest (IAUM) have volatilities of 5.63% and 5.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.