PortfoliosLab logo
BAR vs. IAUM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BAR and IAUM is -1.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

BAR vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR) and iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest (IAUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

BAR:

35.02%

IAUM:

35.19%

Max Drawdown

BAR:

-3.47%

IAUM:

-3.46%

Current Drawdown

BAR:

-2.78%

IAUM:

-2.75%

Returns By Period


BAR

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IAUM

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAR vs. IAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAR has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAR vs. IAUM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAR is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAR is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAR is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAR is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAR is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAR is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IAUM is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IAUM is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IAUM is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IAUM is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IAUM is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IAUM is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BAR vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR) and iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

BAR vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison

Neither BAR nor IAUM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BAR vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAR drawdown since its inception was -3.47%, roughly equal to the maximum IAUM drawdown of -3.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAR and IAUM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BAR vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...