BAR vs. GLTR
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR).
BAR and GLTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BAR is a passively managed fund by GraniteShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on Aug 31, 2017. GLTR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2010. Both BAR and GLTR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BAR vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAR vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | 8.57% | 64.12% | 26.97% | 12.96% | -0.55% | -3.92% | 25.02% | 18.16% | -1.87% | -1.15% |
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 6.38% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | -1.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAR achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's 6.38% return.
BAR
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- -11.05%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 21.20%
- 1Y
- 49.58%
- 3Y*
- 33.22%
- 5Y*
- 21.84%
- 10Y*
- —
GLTR
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- -14.74%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 32.20%
- 1Y
- 68.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.85%
- 5Y*
- 18.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAR vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAR has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BAR vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank
BAR
GLTR
BAR vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAR | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 1.87 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 2.11 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 2.38 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.99 | 8.28 | +1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAR | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.87 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | 0.80 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.34 | +0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAR and GLTR is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BAR vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BAR nor GLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BAR vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAR drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, smaller than the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAR and GLTR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAR | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.53% | -55.70% | +34.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.19% | -29.70% | +10.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.91% | -29.70% | +8.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.22% | -23.32% | +10.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -28.89% | +22.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.19% | 8.54% | -3.35% |
Volatility
BAR vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) is 11.01%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 13.48%. This indicates that BAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAR | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.01% | 13.48% | -2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.13% | 35.75% | -11.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.63% | 37.11% | -9.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 23.16% | -5.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 20.28% | -3.98% |