BAMO vs. THRV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BAMO (Brookstone Opportunities ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BAMO charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.

Performance

BAMO vs. THRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMO achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.79% return.

BAMO

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 5.78%
• 6M: 5.50%
• 1Y: 14.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

THRV

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.33%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMO vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BAMO Brookstone Opportunities ETF	5.78%	2.50%
THRV Prospera Income ETF	1.79%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMO and THRV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	0.66

Return for Risk

BAMO vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMO

BAMO Risk / Return Rank: 66
BAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
BAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
BAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
BAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

THRV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMO vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMO	THRV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.87	—	—

Drawdowns

BAMO vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMO drawdown since its inception was -12.72%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMO and THRV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMO	THRV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.72%	-1.50%	-11.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-0.58%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	-0.44%	-0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BAMO	THRV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.83%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.72%	2.96%	+3.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.58%	2.96%	+6.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.58%	2.96%	+6.62%

BAMO vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMO has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMO vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison

BAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than THRV's 5.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMO Brookstone Opportunities ETF	1.46%	1.54%	1.58%	0.48%
THRV Prospera Income ETF	5.40%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMO and THRV in my portfolio?

BAMO and THRV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BAMO or THRV?

On fees, BAMO is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMO or THRV?

BAMO is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMO or THRV?

THRV has the higher dividend yield at 5.40%, compared with 1.46% for BAMO.

What is the main difference between BAMO and THRV?

They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for BAMO and 1.80% for THRV.