PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMD vs. SPYI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAMD vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMD achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly higher than SPYI's 6.95% return.


BAMD

1D
0.43%
1M
0.63%
YTD
10.29%
6M
10.07%
1Y
11.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYI

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.07%
YTD
6.95%
6M
6.74%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMD vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
10.29%-1.33%19.76%10.73%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
6.95%16.67%19.03%6.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMD and SPYI is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023

0.41

BAMD vs. SPYI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BAMD
SPYI

Financial Services

26.4%
11.1%

Energy

14.8%
3.1%

Technology

14.6%
39.1%

Consumer Defensive

12.6%
4.5%

Utilities

12.3%
2.1%

Industrials

4.4%
7.8%

Healthcare

4.2%
8.3%

Communication Services

4.0%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
9.9%

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.7%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.8%

Financial Services

BAMD
26.4%
SPYI
11.1%

Energy

BAMD
14.8%
SPYI
3.1%

Technology

BAMD
14.6%
SPYI
39.1%

Consumer Defensive

BAMD
12.6%
SPYI
4.5%

Utilities

BAMD
12.3%
SPYI
2.1%

Industrials

BAMD
4.4%
SPYI
7.8%

Healthcare

BAMD
4.2%
SPYI
8.3%

Communication Services

BAMD
4.0%
SPYI
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BAMD
3.7%
SPYI
9.9%

Basic Materials

BAMD
2.7%
SPYI
1.7%

Real Estate

BAMD
0.5%
SPYI
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAMD vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMD
BAMD Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BAMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMD Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYI
SPYI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMD vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAMDSPYIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.41

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

2.80

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

14.03

-9.60

BAMD vs. SPYI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the SPYI Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMD and SPYI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAMD vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMD drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYI drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMD and SPYI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMDSPYIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.91%

-16.47%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-7.72%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-1.21%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-1.81%

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

1.54%

+1.10%

Volatility

BAMD vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) is 3.28%, while NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that BAMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAMDSPYIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

4.06%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

8.23%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

10.27%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.32%

13.01%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.32%

13.01%

+0.31%

BAMD vs. SPYI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAMD vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison

BAMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than SPYI's 12.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
3.49%3.86%4.21%0.70%0.00%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
12.85%11.70%12.04%12.01%4.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAMD and SPYI have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYI has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to BAMD (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMD dropped -15.91% vs SPYI's -16.47%.

On 1-year performance, SPYI leads with 21.49% vs 11.67% for BAMD. On fees, SPYI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BAMD has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPYI has performed better with a 21.49% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMD.

SPYI has the higher dividend yield at 12.85%, compared with 3.49% for BAMD.

BAMD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMD and 0.68% for SPYI.

SPYI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAMD and SPYI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer