PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYI vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYI vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYI achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.15% return.


SPYI

1D
0.70%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
7.35%
6M
6.76%
1Y
19.02%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQI

1D
1.47%
1M
0.39%
YTD
13.15%
6M
12.33%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYI vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
7.35%16.67%16.11%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.15%18.62%19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYI and QQQI is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024

0.94

The correlation between SPYI and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYI vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYI
QQQI

Technology

39.1%
60.2%

Financial Services

11.1%
0.2%

Communication Services

10.7%
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.3%
3.7%

Industrials

7.8%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
6.5%

Energy

3.1%
0.5%

Utilities

2.1%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.1%

Technology

SPYI
39.1%
QQQI
60.2%

Financial Services

SPYI
11.1%
QQQI
0.2%

Communication Services

SPYI
10.7%
QQQI
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYI
9.9%
QQQI
10.1%

Healthcare

SPYI
8.3%
QQQI
3.7%

Industrials

SPYI
7.8%
QQQI
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

SPYI
4.5%
QQQI
6.5%

Energy

SPYI
3.1%
QQQI
0.5%

Utilities

SPYI
2.1%
QQQI
1.2%

Real Estate

SPYI
1.8%
QQQI
0.1%

Basic Materials

SPYI
1.7%
QQQI
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYI vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYI
SPYI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYI vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYIQQQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.70

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.11

11.32

+0.79

SPYI vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYI Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYI and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYI vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYI drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum QQQI drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYI and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYIQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

-20.00%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-9.61%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-0.42%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-2.21%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

2.28%

-0.71%

Volatility

SPYI vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) is 4.54%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that SPYI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYIQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

8.17%

-3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

12.29%

-3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

15.04%

-4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.01%

17.56%

-4.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.01%

17.56%

-4.55%

SPYI vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPYI and QQQI have an expense ratio of 0.68%.


Dividends

SPYI vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

SPYI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%, less than QQQI's 13.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.43%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
11.85%11.70%12.04%12.01%4.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SPYI and QQQI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQI has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to SPYI (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYI dropped -16.47% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 25.79% vs 19.02% for SPYI. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, SPYI has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 25.79% return vs 19.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYI and QQQI have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.43%, compared with 11.85% for SPYI.

SPYI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100.

SPYI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYI and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer