BAMD vs. NFXS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BAMD (Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF) and NFXS (Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - BAMD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Brookstone, while NFXS is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAMD returned 11.16% vs 64.26% for NFXS. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. BAMD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for NFXS.

Performance

BAMD vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMD achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 24.21% return.

BAMD

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 11.12%
• 6M: 11.15%
• 1Y: 11.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFXS

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 21.28%
• YTD: 24.21%
• 6M: 24.00%
• 1Y: 64.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMD vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	11.12%	-1.33%	-1.68%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	24.21%	-8.56%	-21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMD and NFXS is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	-0.05

Return for Risk

BAMD vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMD

BAMD Risk / Return Rank: 31
BAMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
BAMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
BAMD Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BAMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
BAMD Martin Ratio Rank: 32

NFXS

NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 55
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMD vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMD	NFXS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	1.91	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	2.55	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.36	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	2.06	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.24	5.64	-1.40

BAMD vs. NFXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the NFXS Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMD and NFXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAMD vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMD drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, smaller than the maximum NFXS drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMD and NFXS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMD	NFXS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.91%	-50.37%	+34.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.99%	-31.31%	+24.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-12.88%	+12.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.21%	-31.93%	+27.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	11.45%	-8.81%

Volatility

BAMD vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) is 3.34%, while Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) has a volatility of 7.74%. This indicates that BAMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMD	NFXS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.34%	7.74%	-4.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.16%	26.22%	-19.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.90%	33.81%	-22.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.32%	34.65%	-21.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	34.65%	-21.33%

BAMD vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMD vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison

BAMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than NFXS's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	3.47%	3.86%	4.21%	0.70%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	3.23%	3.53%	0.87%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMD and NFXS in my portfolio?

BAMD and NFXS have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMD or NFXS?

NFXS has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to BAMD (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMD dropped -15.91% vs NFXS's -50.37%.

Which ETF is better, BAMD or NFXS?

On 1-year performance, NFXS leads with 64.26% vs 11.16% for BAMD. On fees, BAMD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BAMD has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMD or NFXS?

Over the 1-year period, NFXS has performed better with a 64.26% return vs 11.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMD or NFXS?

BAMD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMD or NFXS?

BAMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 3.23% for NFXS.

What is the main difference between BAMD and NFXS?

BAMD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NFXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMD and 1.03% for NFXS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NFXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.