BAMD vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BAMD (Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAMD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Brookstone, while MULL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAMD returned 11.67% vs 4857.78% for MULL. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BAMD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

BAMD vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMD achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 1,096.58% return.

BAMD

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 10.29%
• 6M: 10.07%
• 1Y: 11.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: 14.08%
• 1M: 129.77%
• YTD: 1,096.58%
• 6M: 1,164.65%
• 1Y: 4,857.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMD vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	10.29%	-1.33%	-5.10%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	1,096.58%	558.51%	-39.23%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMD and MULL is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2024	0.05

BAMD vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAMD	MULL
Financial Services	26.4%	-
Energy	14.8%	-
Technology	14.6%	66.7%
Consumer Defensive	12.6%	-
Utilities	12.3%	-
Industrials	4.4%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Communication Services	4.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.7%	-
Basic Materials	2.7%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

BAMD vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMD

BAMD Risk / Return Rank: 31
BAMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
BAMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
BAMD Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BAMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
BAMD Martin Ratio Rank: 32

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 98
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMD vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMD	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	34.53	-33.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	6.22	-4.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.78	-0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	92.96	-91.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.43	298.64	-294.20

BAMD vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 34.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMD and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAMD vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMD drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMD and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMD	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.91%	-72.29%	+56.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.99%	-53.09%	+46.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	0.00%	-1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.22%	-20.50%	+16.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	16.49%	-13.85%

Volatility

BAMD vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) is 3.28%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 66.44%. This indicates that BAMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMD	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	66.44%	-63.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.14%	116.36%	-109.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.89%	143.21%	-132.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.32%	140.95%	-127.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	140.95%	-127.63%

BAMD vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMD vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

BAMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than MULL's 0.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	3.49%	3.86%	4.21%	0.70%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.03%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMD and MULL in my portfolio?

BAMD and MULL have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMD or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (66.44%) compared to BAMD (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMD dropped -15.91% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, BAMD or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 4857.78% vs 11.67% for BAMD. On fees, BAMD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BAMD has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMD or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 4857.78% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMD or MULL?

BAMD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMD or MULL?

BAMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.03% for MULL.

What is the main difference between BAMD and MULL?

BAMD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MULL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMD and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (34.53 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.