BAMD vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAMD (Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAMD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Brookstone, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAMD returned 7.69% vs 2.93% for BAMU. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BAMD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

BAMD vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMD achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.06% return.

BAMD

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 8.13%
• 6M: 8.26%
• 1Y: 7.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 2.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMD vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	8.13%	-1.33%	19.76%	10.73%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.06%	3.21%	4.14%	1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMD and BAMU is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.02

BAMD vs. BAMU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAMD	BAMU
Financial Services	26.8%	98.8%
Energy	15.6%	-
Technology	13.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	12.8%	-
Utilities	12.6%	-
Industrials	4.7%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Communication Services	4.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.2%	-
Basic Materials	2.6%	-
Real Estate	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

BAMD vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMD

BAMD Risk / Return Rank: 22
BAMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BAMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
BAMD Omega Ratio Rank: 19
BAMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BAMD Martin Ratio Rank: 23

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMD vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMD	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	4.98	-4.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	8.77	-7.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	2.41	-1.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	24.89	-23.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.91	97.89	-94.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAMD vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMD and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMD	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	4.98	-4.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	4.14	-3.10

Drawdowns

BAMD vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMD drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMD and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMD	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.91%	-0.36%	-15.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.99%	-0.12%	-6.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	0.00%	-1.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.29%	-0.02%	-4.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	0.03%	+2.62%

Volatility

BAMD vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.07%. This indicates that BAMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMD	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.47%	0.07%	+2.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.83%	0.43%	+6.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.77%	0.59%	+10.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.35%	0.87%	+12.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.35%	0.87%	+12.48%

BAMD vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMD vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

BAMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than BAMU's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	3.56%	3.86%	4.21%	0.70%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMD and BAMU in my portfolio?

BAMD and BAMU have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMD or BAMU?

BAMD has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to BAMU (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMD dropped -15.91% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, BAMD or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BAMD leads with 7.69% vs 2.93% for BAMU. On fees, BAMD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMD or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BAMD has performed better with a 7.69% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMD or BAMU?

BAMD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMD or BAMU?

BAMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 3.06% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between BAMD and BAMU?

BAMD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMD and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.