BAMU vs. BAMG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) and Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG).

BAMU and BAMG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BAMU is an actively managed fund by Brookstone. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023. BAMG is an actively managed fund by Brookstone. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023.

Performance

BAMU vs. BAMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) and Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BAMU vs. BAMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	0.60%	3.21%	4.14%	1.20%
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	-9.00%	17.03%	24.01%	11.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMU achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than BAMG's -9.00% return.

BAMU

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 0.60%
• 6M: 1.39%
• 1Y: 2.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMG

• 1D: 3.10%
• 1M: -6.08%
• YTD: -9.00%
• 6M: -4.14%
• 1Y: 14.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMU vs. BAMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMU has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMG's 0.95% expense ratio.

BAMU

Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF

BAMG

Brookstone Growth Stock ETF

Return for Risk

BAMU vs. BAMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 99
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

BAMG

BAMG Risk / Return Rank: 41
BAMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
BAMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
BAMG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
BAMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BAMG Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMU vs. BAMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) and Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMU	BAMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.42	0.71	+3.71
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	7.57	1.16	+6.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.12	1.16	+0.95
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	25.11	1.13	+23.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	89.35	4.21	+85.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAMU vs. BAMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMU Sharpe Ratio is 4.42, which is higher than the BAMG Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMU and BAMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMU	BAMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.42	0.71	+3.71
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.11	0.99	+3.12

Correlation

The correlation between BAMU and BAMG is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BAMU vs. BAMG - Dividend Comparison

BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while BAMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.13%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.24%	0.12%

Drawdowns

BAMU vs. BAMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMU drawdown since its inception was -0.36%, smaller than the maximum BAMG drawdown of -21.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMU and BAMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMU	BAMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.36%	-21.00%	+20.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.12%	-13.08%	+12.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-10.39%	+10.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-2.56%	+2.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	3.51%	-3.48%

Volatility

BAMU vs. BAMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) is 0.20%, while Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that BAMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMU	BAMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.20%	5.48%	-5.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.47%	11.13%	-10.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67%	20.26%	-19.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.90%	17.11%	-16.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.90%	17.11%	-16.21%