BAMA vs. BAMD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAMA (Brookstone Active ETF) and BAMD (Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAMA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Brookstone, while BAMD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAMA returned 20.45% vs 7.69% for BAMD. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BAMA charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BAMD.

Performance

BAMA vs. BAMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) and Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMA achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly higher than BAMD's 8.13% return.

BAMA

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 4.12%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 6M: 9.20%
• 1Y: 20.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMD

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 8.13%
• 6M: 8.26%
• 1Y: 7.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMA vs. BAMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF	8.76%	12.61%	14.99%	8.02%
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	8.13%	-1.33%	19.76%	10.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMA and BAMD is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.43

BAMA vs. BAMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAMA	BAMD
Technology	36.8%	13.0%
Financial Services	13.7%	26.8%
Communication Services	11.3%	4.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	3.2%
Industrials	9.5%	4.7%
Healthcare	6.9%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	12.8%
Basic Materials	2.9%	2.6%
Energy	2.5%	15.6%
Utilities	1.9%	12.6%
Real Estate	1.6%	0.6%

Return for Risk

BAMA vs. BAMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMA

BAMA Risk / Return Rank: 68
BAMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BAMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
BAMA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
BAMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
BAMA Martin Ratio Rank: 70

BAMD

BAMD Risk / Return Rank: 22
BAMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BAMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
BAMD Omega Ratio Rank: 19
BAMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BAMD Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMA vs. BAMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) and Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMA	BAMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	0.72	+1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	1.09	+2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.13	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	1.11	+1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.82	2.91	+9.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAMA vs. BAMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the BAMD Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMA and BAMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMA	BAMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	0.72	+1.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.67	1.04	+0.63

Drawdowns

BAMA vs. BAMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMA drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum BAMD drawdown of -15.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMA and BAMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMA	BAMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.27%	-15.91%	+3.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.35%	-6.99%	-0.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-1.45%	+0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	-4.29%	+3.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	2.65%	-1.05%

Volatility

BAMA vs. BAMD - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) at 2.47%. This indicates that BAMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMA	BAMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.16%	2.47%	+0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.71%	6.83%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.17%	10.77%	-1.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.22%	13.35%	-3.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.22%	13.35%	-3.13%

BAMA vs. BAMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMA has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMA vs. BAMD - Dividend Comparison

BAMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than BAMD's 3.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF	1.31%	1.54%	1.49%	0.45%
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	3.56%	3.86%	4.21%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMA and BAMD in my portfolio?

BAMA and BAMD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMA or BAMD?

BAMA has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to BAMD (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMA dropped -12.27% vs BAMD's -15.91%.

Which ETF is better, BAMA or BAMD?

On 1-year performance, BAMA leads with 20.45% vs 7.69% for BAMD. On fees, BAMD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BAMD has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMA or BAMD?

Over the 1-year period, BAMA has performed better with a 20.45% return vs 7.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMA or BAMD?

BAMD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BAMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMA or BAMD?

BAMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 1.31% for BAMA.

What is the main difference between BAMA and BAMD?

BAMA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while BAMD is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for BAMA and 0.95% for BAMD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.