BAMA vs. BAMG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BAMA (Brookstone Active ETF) and BAMG (Brookstone Growth Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAMA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Brookstone, while BAMG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAMA returned 20.01% vs 28.38% for BAMG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BAMA charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BAMG.

Performance

BAMA vs. BAMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) and Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMA achieves a 8.30% return, which is significantly lower than BAMG's 11.33% return.

BAMA

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 8.30%
• 6M: 8.31%
• 1Y: 20.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMG

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 4.51%
• YTD: 11.33%
• 6M: 9.98%
• 1Y: 28.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMA vs. BAMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF	8.30%	12.61%	14.99%	8.02%
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	11.33%	17.03%	24.01%	11.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMA and BAMG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.90

The correlation between BAMA and BAMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BAMA vs. BAMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMA

BAMA Risk / Return Rank: 64
BAMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
BAMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BAMA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BAMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
BAMA Martin Ratio Rank: 67

BAMG

BAMG Risk / Return Rank: 52
BAMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BAMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BAMG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BAMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
BAMG Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMA vs. BAMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) and Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMA	BAMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	1.88	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	2.57	+0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.33	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	2.18	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.03	8.41	+3.62

BAMA vs. BAMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the BAMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMA and BAMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAMA vs. BAMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMA drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum BAMG drawdown of -21.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMA and BAMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMA	BAMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.27%	-21.00%	+8.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.35%	-13.08%	+5.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-0.01%	-1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-2.50%	+1.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.67%	3.38%	-1.71%

Volatility

BAMA vs. BAMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) is 4.27%, while Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that BAMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMA	BAMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.27%	5.95%	-1.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.56%	11.94%	-3.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.89%	15.19%	-5.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.40%	17.14%	-6.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.40%	17.14%	-6.74%

BAMA vs. BAMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMA has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMG's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMA vs. BAMG - Dividend Comparison

BAMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, while BAMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF	1.31%	1.54%	1.49%	0.45%
BAMG Brookstone Growth Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.24%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMA and BAMG in my portfolio?

BAMA and BAMG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMA or BAMG?

BAMG has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to BAMA (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMA dropped -12.27% vs BAMG's -21.00%.

Which ETF is better, BAMA or BAMG?

On 1-year performance, BAMG leads with 28.38% vs 20.01% for BAMA. On fees, BAMG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BAMA has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMA or BAMG?

Over the 1-year period, BAMG has performed better with a 28.38% return vs 20.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMA or BAMG?

BAMG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BAMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMA or BAMG?

BAMA has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for BAMG.

What is the main difference between BAMA and BAMG?

BAMA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while BAMG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for BAMA and 0.95% for BAMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.