BAM vs. XLV
BAM (Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.) is a stock, while XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Over the past 3 years, BAM returned 16.64%/yr vs 7.12%/yr for XLV. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAM vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAM achieves a -8.16% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's -0.23% return.
BAM
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- -8.16%
- 6M
- -10.55%
- 1Y
- -10.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
BAM vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | -8.16% | -0.24% | 39.70% | 45.61% | -10.80% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.23% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAM and XLV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAM vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
BAM
XLV
BAM vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAM | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.17 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 1.38 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 3.31 | -4.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAM vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAM drawdown since its inception was -30.37%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAM | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.37% | -39.17% | +8.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.37% | -10.47% | -19.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.37% | -17.11% | -13.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.66% | -3.59% | -19.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -7.12% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.80% | 4.37% | +12.43% |
Volatility
BAM vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) has a higher volatility of 10.83% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 4.90%. This indicates that BAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAM | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.83% | 4.90% | +5.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.75% | 10.60% | +12.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.82% | 15.03% | +14.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.18% | 14.75% | +15.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.18% | 16.58% | +13.60% |
Dividends
BAM vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
BAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than XLV's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 3.99% | 3.34% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAM and XLV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAM has higher volatility (10.83%) compared to XLV (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAM dropped -30.37% vs XLV's -39.17%.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAM and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer