BAIV vs. KEMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAIV (Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. BAIV is actively managed, while KEMX is passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BAIV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.

Performance

BAIV vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF (BAIV) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BAIV

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 2.26%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KEMX

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 13.02%
• YTD: 42.26%
• 6M: 47.92%
• 1Y: 79.97%
• 3Y*: 29.66%
• 5Y*: 13.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAIV vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BAIV Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF	-0.83%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	15.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BAIV and KEMX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2026	0.78

Return for Risk

BAIV vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 91
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAIV vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF (BAIV) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAIV	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.16	0.68	-0.84

Drawdowns

BAIV vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAIV drawdown since its inception was -11.41%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAIV and KEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAIV	KEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.41%	-38.80%	+27.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.36%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-1.31%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-8.86%	+4.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BAIV	KEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.86%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.90%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.45%	22.40%	-2.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.45%	18.21%	+1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.45%	20.94%	-1.49%

BAIV vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAIV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAIV vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

BAIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BAIV Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.31%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAIV and KEMX in my portfolio?

BAIV and KEMX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BAIV or KEMX?

On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAIV or KEMX?

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BAIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAIV or KEMX?

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.00% for BAIV.

What is the main difference between BAIV and KEMX?

They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BAIV and 0.25% for KEMX.