BAICX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
BAICX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 7, 2008. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
BAICX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAICX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio | -1.72% | 11.53% | 7.19% | 9.24% | -12.42% | 6.61% | 6.34% | 13.61% | -3.78% | 8.79% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAICX achieves a -1.72% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, BAICX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 4.85%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
BAICX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- -1.72%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 7.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.85%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAICX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAICX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BAICX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
BAICX
FASGX
BAICX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAICX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.21 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.73 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.26 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.55 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | 6.89 | -0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAICX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.21 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.53 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.70 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.60 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAICX and FASGX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BAICX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
BAICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio | 5.98% | 6.26% | 5.85% | 4.20% | 4.21% | 4.90% | 4.07% | 4.69% | 5.28% | 4.60% | 4.71% | 5.34% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
BAICX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAICX drawdown since its inception was -33.29%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAICX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAICX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.29% | -47.35% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.00% | -9.07% | +4.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.64% | -23.54% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.76% | -27.20% | +7.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.81% | -7.95% | +3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -6.74% | +2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 2.04% | -0.78% |
Volatility
BAICX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) is 2.26%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that BAICX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAICX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 4.57% | -2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.69% | 7.78% | -4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.19% | 12.82% | -6.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 12.14% | -5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.99% | 12.56% | -6.57% |