BAICX vs. LSSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX).
BAICX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 7, 2008. LSSAX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Mar 2, 2006.
Performance
BAICX vs. LSSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAICX vs. LSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio | -1.72% | 11.53% | 7.19% | 9.24% | -12.42% | 6.61% | 6.34% | 13.61% | -3.78% | 8.79% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 0.29% | 8.32% | 3.94% | 7.01% | -11.82% | 0.64% | 4.68% | 6.81% | 2.48% | 3.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAICX achieves a -1.72% return, which is significantly lower than LSSAX's 0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, BAICX has outperformed LSSAX with an annualized return of 4.85%, while LSSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.
BAICX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- -1.72%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 7.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.85%
LSSAX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAICX vs. LSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAICX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSAX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BAICX vs. LSSAX — Risk / Return Rank
BAICX
LSSAX
BAICX vs. LSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAICX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.61 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 2.49 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 3.41 | -1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | 10.00 | -3.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAICX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.61 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.25 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.59 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.95 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAICX and LSSAX is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BAICX vs. LSSAX - Dividend Comparison
BAICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, more than LSSAX's 4.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio | 5.98% | 6.26% | 5.85% | 4.20% | 4.21% | 4.90% | 4.07% | 4.69% | 5.28% | 4.60% | 4.71% | 5.34% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 4.28% | 4.23% | 4.54% | 5.65% | 6.47% | 6.38% | 5.95% | 5.48% | 5.62% | 5.42% | 5.12% | 5.20% |
Drawdowns
BAICX vs. LSSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAICX drawdown since its inception was -33.29%, which is greater than LSSAX's maximum drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAICX and LSSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAICX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.29% | -16.40% | -16.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.00% | -2.45% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.64% | -16.40% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.76% | -16.40% | -3.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.81% | -1.53% | -3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -1.98% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 0.84% | +0.42% |
Volatility
BAICX vs. LSSAX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) at 1.24%. This indicates that BAICX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAICX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 1.24% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.69% | 2.68% | +1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.19% | 4.69% | +1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 5.73% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.99% | 4.39% | +1.60% |