BAICX vs. LSSAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BAICX (BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio) and LSSAX (Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund) are both mutual funds - BAICX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock, while LSSAX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. Over the past 10 years, BAICX returned 5.29%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for LSSAX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BAICX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for LSSAX.

Performance

BAICX vs. LSSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAICX achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than LSSAX's 1.24% return. Over the past 10 years, BAICX has outperformed LSSAX with an annualized return of 5.29%, while LSSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.

BAICX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 3.35%
• 6M: 3.91%
• 1Y: 10.16%
• 3Y*: 9.47%
• 5Y*: 3.77%
• 10Y*: 5.29%

LSSAX

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 1.24%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: 5.75%
• 3Y*: 5.77%
• 5Y*: 1.40%
• 10Y*: 2.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAICX vs. LSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BAICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio	3.35%	11.53%	7.19%	9.24%	-12.42%	6.61%	6.34%	13.61%	-3.78%	8.79%
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund	1.24%	8.32%	3.94%	7.01%	-11.82%	0.64%	4.68%	6.81%	2.48%	3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BAICX and LSSAX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2008	0.14

Over the past year, BAICX and LSSAX have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

BAICX vs. LSSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAICX

BAICX Risk / Return Rank: 47
BAICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
BAICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BAICX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
BAICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
BAICX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

LSSAX

LSSAX Risk / Return Rank: 59
LSSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LSSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
LSSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
LSSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LSSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAICX vs. LSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAICX	LSSAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	1.85	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	2.87	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.35	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	3.52	-1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.19	11.69	-2.50

BAICX vs. LSSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAICX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the LSSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAICX and LSSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAICX vs. LSSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAICX drawdown since its inception was -33.29%, which is greater than LSSAX's maximum drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAICX and LSSAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAICX	LSSAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.29%	-16.40%	-16.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.00%	-2.16%	-2.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.85%	-5.91%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.64%	-16.40%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.76%	-16.40%	-3.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-0.61%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.73%	-1.97%	-1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.16%	0.73%	+0.43%

Volatility

BAICX vs. LSSAX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) has a higher volatility of 2.08% compared to Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) at 1.21%. This indicates that BAICX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAICX	LSSAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.08%	1.21%	+0.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.67%	2.77%	+1.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.60%	4.12%	+1.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.32%	5.80%	+0.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.08%	4.43%	+1.65%

BAICX vs. LSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAICX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSAX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAICX vs. LSSAX - Dividend Comparison

BAICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than LSSAX's 4.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio	6.37%	6.26%	5.85%	4.20%	4.21%	4.90%	4.07%	4.69%	5.28%	4.60%	4.71%	5.34%
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund	4.34%	4.23%	4.54%	5.65%	6.47%	6.38%	5.95%	5.48%	5.62%	5.42%	5.12%	5.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAICX and LSSAX in my portfolio?

BAICX and LSSAX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAICX or LSSAX?

BAICX has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to LSSAX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAICX dropped -33.29% vs LSSAX's -16.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.