PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAC vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAC vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly higher than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, BAC has outperformed T with an annualized return of 18.19%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.


BAC

1D
2.31%
1M
13.98%
YTD
3.72%
6M
3.46%
1Y
30.78%
3Y*
27.43%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
18.19%

T

1D
2.52%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
-12.71%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
3.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAC vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
3.72%28.04%33.85%4.83%-23.82%49.61%-11.63%46.19%-15.00%35.69%
T
AT&T Inc.
-2.96%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BAC and T is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 1986

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between BAC and T has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

BAC:

$4.19

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

BAC:

13.36

T:

7.74

PEG Ratio

BAC:

5.36

T:

0.32

PS Ratio

BAC:

2.42

T:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAC:

$174.85B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAC:

$110.47B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAC:

$41.74B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAC vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAC
BAC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAC vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BACTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.92

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

-0.59

+2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

-1.22

+5.43

BAC vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAC and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAC vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.10%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BACTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.10%

-64.15%

-28.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.93%

-21.87%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.51%

-21.87%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.64%

-32.01%

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.95%

-42.35%

-6.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-18.12%

+17.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.30%

-15.72%

-12.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.96%

10.64%

-3.68%

Volatility

BAC vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is 5.49%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that BAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BACTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

8.21%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.57%

17.80%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.62%

22.13%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.89%

24.01%

+2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.68%

23.73%

+6.95%

Dividends

BAC vs. T - Dividend Comparison

BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than T's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.72%1.96%2.28%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.71%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

BAC vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of America Corporation and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


25.00B30.00B35.00B40.00B45.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
30.27B
33.47B
(BAC) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BAC and T have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to BAC (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAC dropped -93.10% vs T's -64.15%.

BAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAC and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer