PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAC vs. SUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAC vs. SUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and Sunoco LP (SUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly lower than SUN's 28.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BAC having a 18.19% annualized return and SUN not far ahead at 18.66%.


BAC

1D
2.31%
1M
13.82%
YTD
3.72%
6M
3.46%
1Y
29.23%
3Y*
27.43%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
18.19%

SUN

1D
1.57%
1M
-6.67%
YTD
28.53%
6M
25.21%
1Y
29.03%
3Y*
21.16%
5Y*
19.32%
10Y*
18.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAC vs. SUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
3.72%28.04%33.85%4.83%-23.82%49.61%-11.63%46.19%-15.00%35.69%
SUN
Sunoco LP
28.53%8.88%-8.59%49.38%13.95%55.26%6.28%24.78%7.71%17.86%

Correlation

The correlation between BAC and SUN is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2012

0.25

The correlation between BAC and SUN shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAC:

$415.53B

SUN:

$3.37T

EPS

BAC:

$4.19

SUN:

$0.06

PE Ratio

BAC:

13.36

SUN:

1.02K

PS Ratio

BAC:

2.42

SUN:

42.37

PB Ratio

BAC:

1.51

SUN:

1.30K

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAC:

$174.85B

SUN:

$20.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAC:

$110.47B

SUN:

$1.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAC:

$41.74B

SUN:

$2.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAC vs. SUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAC
BAC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SUN
SUN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUN Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAC vs. SUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and Sunoco LP (SUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BACSUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.64

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

6.54

-2.33

BAC vs. SUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the SUN Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAC and SUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAC vs. SUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.10%, which is greater than SUN's maximum drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and SUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BACSUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.10%

-65.47%

-27.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.93%

-11.05%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.51%

-21.29%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.64%

-21.29%

-25.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.95%

-62.94%

+13.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-9.53%

+9.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.30%

-16.30%

-12.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.96%

4.47%

+2.49%

Volatility

BAC vs. SUN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is 5.49%, while Sunoco LP (SUN) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that BAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BACSUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

8.22%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.57%

16.97%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.62%

23.06%

-1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.89%

23.67%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.68%

31.76%

-1.08%

Dividends

BAC vs. SUN - Dividend Comparison

BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than SUN's 5.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.72%1.96%2.28%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%
SUN
Sunoco LP
5.74%6.89%6.74%5.59%7.66%8.09%11.47%10.79%12.14%11.63%12.16%6.78%

Financials

BAC vs. SUN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of America Corporation and Sunoco LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
30.27B
0
(BAC) Total Revenue
(SUN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BAC and SUN have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SUN has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to BAC (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAC dropped -93.10% vs SUN's -65.47%.

BAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAC and SUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer