BAC vs. CVS
BAC (Bank of America Corporation) and CVS (CVS Health Corporation) are both stocks. BAC operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while CVS operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, BAC returned 18.19%/yr vs 3.70%/yr for CVS. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAC vs. CVS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly lower than CVS's 30.67% return. Over the past 10 years, BAC has outperformed CVS with an annualized return of 18.19%, while CVS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.70% annualized return.
BAC
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 13.82%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 29.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 18.19%
CVS
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 30.67%
- 6M
- 30.57%
- 1Y
- 59.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.08%
- 10Y*
- 3.70%
BAC vs. CVS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 3.72% | 28.04% | 33.85% | 4.83% | -23.82% | 49.61% | -11.63% | 46.19% | -15.00% | 35.69% |
CVS CVS Health Corporation | 30.67% | 84.35% | -40.77% | -12.53% | -7.63% | 54.87% | -5.14% | 17.26% | -7.04% | -5.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAC and CVS is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 1986 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BAC and CVS has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
BAC:
$415.53B
CVS:
$130.41B
BAC:
$4.19
CVS:
$2.30
BAC:
13.36
CVS:
44.29
BAC:
2.42
CVS:
0.32
BAC:
1.51
CVS:
1.68
BAC:
$174.85B
CVS:
$407.91B
BAC:
$110.47B
CVS:
$56.59B
BAC:
$41.74B
CVS:
$9.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAC vs. CVS — Risk / Return Rank
BAC
CVS
BAC vs. CVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and CVS Health Corporation (CVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAC | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 3.62 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | 9.33 | -5.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAC vs. CVS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.10%, which is greater than CVS's maximum drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and CVS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAC | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.10% | -64.07% | -29.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.93% | -16.44% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.51% | -43.98% | +16.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.64% | -56.79% | +10.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.95% | -56.79% | +7.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | 0.00% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.30% | -19.54% | -8.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.96% | 6.38% | +0.58% |
Volatility
BAC vs. CVS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is 5.49%, while CVS Health Corporation (CVS) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that BAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAC | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 7.50% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.57% | 25.88% | -9.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.62% | 31.05% | -9.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.89% | 29.98% | -3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.68% | 29.30% | +1.38% |
Dividends
BAC vs. CVS - Dividend Comparison
BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than CVS's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2.72% | 1.96% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% |
CVS CVS Health Corporation | 2.61% | 3.35% | 5.93% | 3.06% | 2.36% | 1.94% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.76% | 2.15% | 1.43% |
Financials
BAC vs. CVS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of America Corporation and CVS Health Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BAC vs. CVS - Profitability Comparison
BAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 28.94B and revenue of 30.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.6%.
CVS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.62B and revenue of 100.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.6%.
BAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 10.40B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.4%.
CVS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported an operating income of 4.68B and revenue of 100.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.
BAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 8.58B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in a net margin of 28.4%.
CVS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported a net income of 2.94B and revenue of 100.43B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BAC and CVS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVS has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to BAC (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAC dropped -93.10% vs CVS's -64.07%.
CVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAC and CVS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer