PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVS vs. WBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CVS vs. WBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CVS Health Corporation (CVS) and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CVS

1D
-0.75%
1M
0.34%
6M
42.24%
YTD
34.67%
1Y
72.47%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
3.79%
ALL TIME*
10.07%

WBA

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$797.84M$795.56M$824.15M

CVS vs. WBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVS
CVS Health Corporation
34.67%84.35%-40.77%-12.53%-7.63%54.87%-5.14%17.26%-7.04%-5.75%
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
0.00%28.40%-61.34%-25.09%-25.06%35.78%-29.38%-10.99%-3.65%-10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CVS and WBA is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between CVS and WBA has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

CVS:

$407.91B

WBA:

$154.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CVS:

$56.59B

WBA:

$26.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

CVS:

$9.99B

WBA:

-$2.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVS vs. WBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CVS
CVS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVS Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

WBA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CVS vs. WBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVS Health Corporation (CVS) and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVSWBADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.03

CVS vs. WBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVS vs. WBA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVSWBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.66%

Volatility

CVS vs. WBA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVSWBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.39%

Dividends

CVS vs. WBA - Dividend Comparison

CVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, while WBA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVS
CVS Health Corporation
2.55%3.35%5.93%3.06%2.36%1.94%2.93%2.69%3.05%2.76%2.15%1.43%
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
0.00%0.00%10.72%7.35%5.13%3.62%4.64%3.04%2.46%2.13%1.78%1.64%

Financials

CVS vs. WBA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CVS Health Corporation and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CVS and WBA have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVS and WBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer