BABX vs. TSYY
BABX (GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BABX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BABX returned -8.73% vs -9.44% for TSYY. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 1.15% expense ratio.
Performance
BABX vs. TSYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -34.41% return, which is significantly lower than TSYY's -22.62% return.
BABX
- 1D
- 8.14%
- 1M
- 70.32%
- 6M
- -48.73%
- YTD
- -34.41%
- 1Y
- -8.73%
- 3Y*
- -1.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.23%
TSYY
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- 6M
- -20.06%
- YTD
- -22.62%
- 1Y
- -9.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -24.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.82M | $17.86M | $21.53M | |
| $736.13K | $726.34K | $1.76M |
BABX vs. TSYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | -34.41% | 123.85% | -5.79% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -22.62% | -15.96% | -3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABX and TSYY is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABX vs. TSYY — Risk / Return Rank
BABX
TSYY
BABX vs. TSYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABX | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.97 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | -0.29 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.19 | -0.52 | +0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABX vs. TSYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -78.83%, which is greater than TSYY's maximum drawdown of -42.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and TSYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABX | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.83% | -42.66% | -36.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.83% | -33.02% | -45.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.98% | -41.27% | -21.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.39% | -27.09% | -19.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.06% | 18.15% | +27.91% |
Volatility
BABX vs. TSYY - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) has a higher volatility of 27.52% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) at 6.67%. This indicates that BABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABX | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.52% | 6.67% | +20.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.46% | 16.65% | +41.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.46% | 29.33% | +61.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.45% | 36.37% | +47.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.45% | 36.37% | +47.08% |
BABX vs. TSYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BABX and TSYY have an expense ratio of 1.15%.
Dividends
BABX vs. TSYY - Dividend Comparison
BABX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 245.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 245.52% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABX and TSYY have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BABX has higher volatility (27.52%) compared to TSYY (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABX dropped -78.83% vs TSYY's -42.66%.
On 1-year performance, BABX leads with -8.73% vs -9.44% for TSYY. Both ETFs have the same 1.15% expense ratio. On volatility, TSYY has been the lower-risk option at 6.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BABX has performed better with a -8.73% return vs -9.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BABX and TSYY have the same expense ratio: 1.15% per year.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 245.52%, compared with 0.00% for BABX.
BABX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSYY is Derivative Income.
BABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BABX and TSYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer