BABX vs. PTIR
BABX (GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. BABX is actively managed, while PTIR is passively managed. Over the past year, BABX returned -8.73% vs -54.43% for PTIR. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BABX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PTIR.
Performance
BABX vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -34.41% return, which is significantly higher than PTIR's -60.42% return.
BABX
- 1D
- 8.14%
- 1M
- 70.32%
- 6M
- -48.73%
- YTD
- -34.41%
- 1Y
- -8.73%
- 3Y*
- -1.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.23%
PTIR
- 1D
- 4.65%
- 1M
- -7.52%
- 6M
- -41.51%
- YTD
- -60.42%
- 1Y
- -54.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 170.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.82M | $17.86M | $21.53M | |
| $39.00M | $49.18M | $63.74M |
BABX vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | -34.41% | 123.85% | -2.13% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -60.42% | 221.36% | 425.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABX and PTIR is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024 | 0.13 |
BABX vs. PTIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BABX
PTIR
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
BABX
PTIR
-
Basic Materials
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Communication Services
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Consumer Defensive
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Energy
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Financial Services
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Healthcare
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Industrials
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Real Estate
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Technology
BABX
-
PTIR
Utilities
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABX vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank
BABX
PTIR
BABX vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABX | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.96 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | -0.69 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.19 | -1.12 | +0.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABX vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -78.83%, roughly equal to the maximum PTIR drawdown of -79.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and PTIR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABX | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.83% | -79.40% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.83% | -79.40% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.98% | -72.72% | +9.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.39% | -31.14% | -15.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.06% | 48.78% | -2.72% |
Volatility
BABX vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) have volatilities of 27.52% and 27.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABX | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.52% | 27.20% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.46% | 81.38% | -22.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.46% | 104.63% | -14.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.45% | 127.56% | -44.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.45% | 127.56% | -44.11% |
BABX vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PTIR's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABX vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison
BABX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 14.68% | 5.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABX and PTIR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BABX has higher volatility (27.52%) compared to PTIR (27.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABX dropped -78.83% vs PTIR's -79.40%.
On 1-year performance, BABX leads with -8.73% vs -54.43% for PTIR. On fees, PTIR is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, PTIR has been the lower-risk option at 27.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BABX has performed better with a -8.73% return vs -54.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTIR is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BABX.
PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 14.68%, compared with 0.00% for BABX.
Their fees differ too: 1.15% for BABX and 1.04% for PTIR.
BABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BABX and PTIR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer