PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABX vs. PTIR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BABX vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BABX vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BABX
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
-31.52%123.85%-2.60%
PTIR
GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF
-38.76%221.36%425.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -31.52% return, which is significantly higher than PTIR's -38.76% return.


BABX

1D
5.70%
1M
-25.93%
YTD
-31.52%
6M
-56.68%
1Y
-30.71%
3Y*
-5.38%
5Y*
10Y*

PTIR

1D
12.66%
1M
10.24%
YTD
-38.76%
6M
-46.96%
1Y
94.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BABX vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BABX and PTIR have an expense ratio of 1.15%.


Return for Risk

BABX vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABX
BABX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

PTIR
PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABX vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BABXPTIRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.33

0.82

-1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.09

1.71

-1.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.23

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

1.33

-1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.98

2.91

-3.89

BABX vs. PTIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABX Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the PTIR Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABX and PTIR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BABXPTIRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

0.82

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

2.65

-2.67

Correlation

The correlation between BABX and PTIR is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BABX vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison

BABX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.49%.


Drawdowns

BABX vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -70.62%, roughly equal to the maximum PTIR drawdown of -69.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and PTIR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BABXPTIRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.62%

-69.10%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.43%

-66.10%

+2.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.35%

-57.79%

-3.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.56%

-23.58%

-20.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.47%

30.14%

+1.33%

Volatility

BABX vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) is 25.50%, while GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a volatility of 29.23%. This indicates that BABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BABXPTIRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.50%

29.23%

-3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.87%

76.19%

-17.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.17%

115.15%

-22.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.96%

131.12%

-48.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.96%

131.12%

-48.16%