BABX vs. PTIR
BABX (GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BABX returned -12.32% vs -18.36% for PTIR. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.15% expense ratio.
Performance
BABX vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -34.02% return, which is significantly higher than PTIR's -46.69% return.
BABX
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -11.70%
- YTD
- -34.02%
- 6M
- -43.39%
- 1Y
- -12.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTIR
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- -46.69%
- 6M
- -47.81%
- 1Y
- -18.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABX vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | -34.02% | 123.85% | -2.60% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -46.69% | 221.36% | 425.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABX and PTIR is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | 0.10 |
BABX vs. PTIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BABX
PTIR
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
BABX
PTIR
-
Basic Materials
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Communication Services
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Consumer Defensive
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Energy
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Financial Services
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Healthcare
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Industrials
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Real Estate
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Technology
BABX
-
PTIR
Utilities
BABX
-
PTIR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABX vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank
BABX
PTIR
BABX vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BABX | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.06 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | -0.27 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | -0.46 | +0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BABX | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 | -0.18 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 1.96 | -2.00 |
Drawdowns
BABX vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -70.62%, roughly equal to the maximum PTIR drawdown of -69.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and PTIR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABX | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.62% | -69.10% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.86% | -68.11% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.76% | -63.26% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.26% | -27.55% | -17.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.51% | 39.74% | -3.23% |
Volatility
BABX vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) is 29.33%, while GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a volatility of 33.41%. This indicates that BABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABX | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.33% | 33.41% | -4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.66% | 77.09% | -19.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.54% | 103.09% | -15.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.08% | 129.44% | -46.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.08% | 129.44% | -46.36% |
BABX vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BABX and PTIR have an expense ratio of 1.15%.
Dividends
BABX vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison
BABX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 10.90% | 5.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABX and PTIR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIR has higher volatility (33.41%) compared to BABX (29.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABX dropped -70.62% vs PTIR's -69.10%.
On 1-year performance, BABX leads with -12.32% vs -18.36% for PTIR. Both ETFs have the same 1.15% expense ratio. On volatility, BABX has been the lower-risk option at 29.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BABX has performed better with a -12.32% return vs -18.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BABX and PTIR have the same expense ratio: 1.15% per year.
PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 10.90%, compared with 0.00% for BABX.
BABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BABX and PTIR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer