BABX vs. PTIR

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BABX (GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. BABX is actively managed, while PTIR is passively managed. Over the past year, BABX returned -16.91% vs -44.37% for PTIR. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BABX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PTIR.

Performance

BABX vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -48.20% return, which is significantly higher than PTIR's -54.47% return.

BABX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -3.31%
• 6M: -59.30%
• YTD: -48.20%
• 1Y: -16.91%
• 3Y*: -8.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PTIR

• 1D: 5.64%
• 1M: 5.28%
• 6M: -54.62%
• YTD: -54.47%
• 1Y: -44.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABX vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	-48.20%	123.85%	-2.13%
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	-54.47%	221.36%	425.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BABX and PTIR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.12

BABX vs. PTIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BABX	PTIR
Consumer Cyclical	66.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BABX vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABX

BABX Risk / Return Rank: 9
BABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
BABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
BABX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
BABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BABX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

PTIR

PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 6
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABX vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BABX	PTIR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	-0.43	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	-0.07	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	0.99	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.22	-0.56	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.39	-0.97	+0.58

BABX vs. PTIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABX Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is higher than the PTIR Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABX and PTIR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BABX vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -78.83%, roughly equal to the maximum PTIR drawdown of -79.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and PTIR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BABX	PTIR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.83%	-79.40%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.83%	-79.40%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-78.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.76%	-68.62%	-2.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.05%	-29.92%	-16.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.18%	45.77%	-2.59%

Volatility

BABX vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) is 26.72%, while GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a volatility of 33.43%. This indicates that BABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BABX	PTIR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.72%	33.43%	-6.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.20%	79.68%	-19.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	90.15%	103.01%	-12.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.34%	128.24%	-44.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.34%	128.24%	-44.90%

BABX vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PTIR's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

BABX vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison

BABX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.76%.

Position	TTM	2025
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	12.76%	5.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BABX and PTIR in my portfolio?

BABX and PTIR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BABX or PTIR?

PTIR has higher volatility (33.43%) compared to BABX (26.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABX dropped -78.83% vs PTIR's -79.40%.

Which ETF is better, BABX or PTIR?

On 1-year performance, BABX leads with -16.91% vs -44.37% for PTIR. On fees, PTIR is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, BABX has been the lower-risk option at 26.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BABX or PTIR?

Over the 1-year period, BABX has performed better with a -16.91% return vs -44.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BABX or PTIR?

PTIR is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BABX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BABX or PTIR?

PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 12.76%, compared with 0.00% for BABX.

What is the main difference between BABX and PTIR?

Their fees differ too: 1.15% for BABX and 1.04% for PTIR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.19 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.