BABW vs. GPIX
BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BABW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.
Performance
BABW vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABW achieves a -17.38% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 9.91% return.
BABW
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -5.34%
- YTD
- -17.38%
- 6M
- -24.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPIX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABW vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | -17.38% | -18.22% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 9.91% | 2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABW and GPIX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABW vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank
BABW
GPIX
BABW vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BABW | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.97 | 1.78 | -2.75 |
Drawdowns
BABW vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABW drawdown since its inception was -40.29%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABW and GPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABW | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.29% | -17.50% | -22.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.94% | -0.48% | -35.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.10% | -1.48% | -20.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.53% | — |
Volatility
BABW vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABW | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.61% | 10.17% | +39.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.61% | 13.80% | +35.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.61% | 13.80% | +35.81% |
BABW vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABW vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison
BABW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.81%, more than GPIX's 8.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | 37.81% | 10.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.00% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABW and GPIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABW.
BABW has the higher dividend yield at 37.81%, compared with 8.00% for GPIX.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BABW and 0.29% for GPIX.
Find the right allocation for BABW and GPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer