BABI.L vs. NVDD.L
BABI.L (IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP) and NVDD.L (IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP) are both Derivative Income funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BABI.L returned -24.89% vs -18.30% for NVDD.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
BABI.L vs. NVDD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BABI.L is traded in USD, while NVDD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the NVDD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABI.L achieves a -28.38% return, which is significantly lower than NVDD.L's -16.80% return.
BABI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- 6M
- -35.35%
- YTD
- -28.38%
- 1Y
- -24.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- 6M
- -11.76%
- YTD
- -16.80%
- 1Y
- -18.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABI.L vs. NVDD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BABI.L IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP | -28.38% | 10,934.08% |
NVDD.L IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP | -16.80% | 6.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABI.L and NVDD.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABI.L vs. NVDD.L — Risk / Return Rank
BABI.L
NVDD.L
BABI.L vs. NVDD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L) and IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABI.L | NVDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.97 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | -0.39 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | -0.60 | -0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABI.L vs. NVDD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABI.L drawdown since its inception was -59.96%, which is greater than NVDD.L's maximum drawdown of -46.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABI.L and NVDD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABI.L | NVDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.96% | -46.38% | -13.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.96% | -46.38% | -13.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.55% | -42.19% | -12.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.76% | -25.15% | -3.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.92% | 30.46% | +4.46% |
Volatility
BABI.L vs. NVDD.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L) has a higher volatility of 11.84% compared to IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L) at 8.86%. This indicates that BABI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABI.L | NVDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.84% | 8.86% | +2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 21.96% | +4.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.55% | 52.81% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9,398.92% | 48.64% | +9,350.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9,398.92% | 48.64% | +9,350.28% |
BABI.L vs. NVDD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BABI.L and NVDD.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
BABI.L vs. NVDD.L - Dividend Comparison
BABI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 65.17%, while NVDD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BABI.L IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP | 65.17% | 6.93% |
NVDD.L IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABI.L and NVDD.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BABI.L and NVDD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
Find the right allocation for BABI.L and NVDD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer