BABI.L vs. AHLA.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (AHLA.DE).

BABI.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 27, 2025.

Performance

BABI.L vs. AHLA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (AHLA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BABI.L vs. AHLA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BABI.L IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP	-31.12%	0.62%
AHLA.DE Alibaba Group Holding Limited	-17.00%	31.99%

Different Trading Currencies

BABI.L is traded in USD, while AHLA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AHLA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABI.L achieves a -31.12% return, which is significantly lower than AHLA.DE's -17.00% return.

BABI.L

• 1D: -5.89%
• 1M: -16.53%
• YTD: -31.12%
• 6M: -45.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AHLA.DE

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -12.30%
• YTD: -17.00%
• 6M: -31.54%
• 1Y: -5.98%
• 3Y*: 8.32%
• 5Y*: -10.48%
• 10Y*: 5.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BABI.L vs. AHLA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHLA.DE

AHLA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 28
AHLA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
AHLA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
AHLA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 26
AHLA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
AHLA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABI.L vs. AHLA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (AHLA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BABI.L	AHLA.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.05	0.07	-1.13

Correlation

The correlation between BABI.L and AHLA.DE is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BABI.L vs. AHLA.DE - Dividend Comparison

BABI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than AHLA.DE's 1.39% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BABI.L IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP	0.39%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%
AHLA.DE Alibaba Group Holding Limited	1.39%	1.17%	1.65%	1.13%

Drawdowns

BABI.L vs. AHLA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABI.L drawdown since its inception was -47.29%, smaller than the maximum AHLA.DE drawdown of -80.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABI.L and AHLA.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BABI.L	AHLA.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.29%	-76.63%	+29.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.48%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-69.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.29%	-58.18%	+10.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.07%	-34.06%	+18.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BABI.L	AHLA.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	27.65%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.20%	44.37%	-8.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.20%	49.42%	-13.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.20%	42.11%	-5.91%