BABI.L vs. BABA
Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA).
BABI.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 27, 2025.
Performance
BABI.L vs. BABA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BABI.L vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BABI.L IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP | -26.81% | 0.62% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -14.41% | 29.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABI.L achieves a -26.81% return, which is significantly lower than BABA's -14.41% return.
BABI.L
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -17.47%
- YTD
- -26.81%
- 6M
- -43.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABA
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -12.94%
- YTD
- -14.41%
- 6M
- -29.80%
- 1Y
- -3.52%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -10.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABI.L vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank
BABI.L
BABA
BABI.L vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BABI.L | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.93 | 0.07 | -1.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between BABI.L and BABA is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BABI.L vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison
BABI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than BABA's 1.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABI.L IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP | 0.36% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
BABI.L vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABI.L drawdown since its inception was -44.35%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABI.L and BABA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABI.L | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.35% | -80.09% | +35.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -35.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -74.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.98% | -58.34% | +14.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.90% | -37.23% | +22.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.43% | — |
Volatility
BABI.L vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BABI.L | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.69% | 45.97% | -10.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.69% | 51.12% | -15.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.69% | 43.22% | -7.53% |