PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABI.L vs. MAGD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BABI.L vs. MAGD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L) and IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP (MAGD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BABI.L vs. MAGD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABI.L achieves a -31.12% return, which is significantly lower than MAGD.L's -19.75% return.


BABI.L

1D
-5.89%
1M
-16.53%
YTD
-31.12%
6M
-45.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGD.L

1D
-0.82%
1M
-5.00%
YTD
-19.75%
6M
-19.20%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BABI.L vs. MAGD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGD.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BABI.L vs. MAGD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L) and IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP (MAGD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BABI.L vs. MAGD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BABI.LMAGD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.05

-0.70

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between BABI.L and MAGD.L is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BABI.L vs. MAGD.L - Dividend Comparison

BABI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than MAGD.L's 0.25% yield.


Drawdowns

BABI.L vs. MAGD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABI.L drawdown since its inception was -47.29%, which is greater than MAGD.L's maximum drawdown of -27.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABI.L and MAGD.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BABI.LMAGD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.29%

-27.28%

-20.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.29%

-26.11%

-21.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.07%

-8.36%

-6.71%

Volatility

BABI.L vs. MAGD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BABI.LMAGD.LDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.20%

20.09%

+16.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.20%

20.09%

+16.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.20%

20.09%

+16.11%