BAAPX vs. VUG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BAAPX (BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund Class A) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both funds - BAAPX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by BlackRock, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. BAAPX is actively managed, while VUG is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BAAPX returned 10.19%/yr vs 18.25%/yr for VUG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BAAPX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.

Performance

BAAPX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund Class A (BAAPX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAAPX achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.78% return. Over the past 10 years, BAAPX has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 10.19%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.25% annualized return.

BAAPX

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 4.45%
• YTD: 11.82%
• 6M: 12.24%
• 1Y: 25.99%
• 3Y*: 14.79%
• 5Y*: 7.52%
• 10Y*: 10.19%

VUG

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 5.75%
• YTD: 9.78%
• 6M: 8.99%
• 1Y: 27.72%
• 3Y*: 26.10%
• 5Y*: 15.17%
• 10Y*: 18.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAAPX vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BAAPX BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund Class A	11.82%	17.96%	5.20%	18.82%	-16.39%	14.52%	19.10%	24.24%	-7.93%	17.03%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	9.78%	19.40%	32.69%	46.83%	-33.16%	27.35%	40.25%	37.03%	-3.32%	27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BAAPX and VUG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2006	0.90

The correlation between BAAPX and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BAAPX vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAAPX

BAAPX Risk / Return Rank: 70
BAAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BAAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BAAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
BAAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BAAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

VUG

VUG Risk / Return Rank: 45
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAAPX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund Class A (BAAPX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAAPX	VUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	1.76	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	2.39	+1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.31	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	1.68	+1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.06	5.90	+8.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAAPX vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAAPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAAPX and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAAPX	VUG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	1.76	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.69	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.85	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.62	-0.19

Drawdowns

BAAPX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAAPX drawdown since its inception was -53.61%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAAPX and VUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAAPX	VUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.61%	-50.68%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-16.53%	+7.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.88%	-22.85%	+1.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.52%	-35.61%	+12.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.15%	-35.61%	+8.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-1.25%	+0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.27%	-7.09%	-1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	4.71%	-2.83%

Volatility

BAAPX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund Class A (BAAPX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 3.75% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAAPX	VUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	3.81%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.28%	12.11%	-2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.09%	15.83%	-4.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.52%	22.21%	-7.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.01%	21.44%	-7.43%

BAAPX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAAPX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAAPX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

BAAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAAPX BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund Class A	5.20%	5.82%	0.00%	4.06%	2.00%	5.86%	1.83%	2.23%	5.98%	2.84%	1.49%	13.83%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	0.37%	0.41%	0.47%	0.58%	0.70%	0.48%	0.66%	0.95%	1.32%	1.14%	1.39%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAAPX and VUG in my portfolio?

BAAPX and VUG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAAPX or VUG?

VUG has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to BAAPX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAAPX dropped -53.61% vs VUG's -50.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.