AZYY vs. XRMI

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

AZYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. AZYY is actively managed, while XRMI is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AZYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.

Performance

AZYY vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF (AZYY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZYY achieves a -6.32% return, which is significantly lower than XRMI's 2.10% return.

AZYY

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -5.21%
• YTD: -6.32%
• 6M: -4.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XRMI

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.14%
• YTD: 2.10%
• 6M: 2.43%
• 1Y: 9.31%
• 3Y*: 6.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZYY vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AZYY GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF	-6.32%	-5.56%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	2.10%	4.41%

Correlation

The correlation between AZYY and XRMI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

AZYY vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRMI

XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 48
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZYY vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF (AZYY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AZYY	XRMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.69	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.36	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.86	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.51	—

Drawdowns

AZYY vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZYY drawdown since its inception was -23.12%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZYY and XRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	AZYY	XRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.12%	-15.31%	-7.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.09%	-0.02%	-16.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.25%	-5.88%	-6.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AZYY	XRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.63%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.57%	5.53%	+16.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.57%	6.91%	+14.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.57%	6.91%	+14.66%

AZYY vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AZYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

AZYY vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

AZYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.63%, more than XRMI's 12.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AZYY GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF	46.63%	15.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.57%	12.35%	11.86%	12.62%	12.84%	2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AZYY and XRMI in my portfolio?

AZYY and XRMI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AZYY or XRMI?

On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AZYY or XRMI?

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AZYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AZYY or XRMI?

AZYY has the higher dividend yield at 46.63%, compared with 12.57% for XRMI.

What is the main difference between AZYY and XRMI?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AZYY and 0.60% for XRMI.