AZYY vs. AMDY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AZYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AZYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for AMDY.

Performance

AZYY vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF (AZYY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZYY achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 87.43% return.

AZYY

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -2.37%
• 6M: -7.05%
• YTD: -8.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AMDY

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: -8.47%
• 6M: 81.07%
• YTD: 87.43%
• 1Y: 133.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 47.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	$22.93M	$23.50M	$23.54M
AZYY GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF	$38.28K	$34.29K	$41.33K

AZYY vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AZYY GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF	-8.64%	-5.56%
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	87.43%	29.28%

Correlation

The correlation between AZYY and AMDY is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

AZYY vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AZYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDY

AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 86
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AZYY vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF (AZYY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AZYY	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.13	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.75	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.63	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.02	—

Drawdowns

AZYY vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZYY drawdown since its inception was -23.12%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZYY and AMDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	AZYY	AMDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.12%	-53.92%	+30.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-27.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.17%	-15.82%	-2.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.82%	-17.40%	+4.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AZYY	AMDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.43%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	48.49%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.60%	60.09%	-39.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.60%	48.06%	-27.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.60%	48.06%	-27.46%

AZYY vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AZYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

AZYY vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

AZYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.96%, less than AMDY's 76.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	76.77%	80.68%	109.98%	6.68%
AZYY GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF	53.96%	15.86%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AZYY and AMDY in my portfolio?

AZYY and AMDY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AZYY or AMDY?

On fees, AZYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AZYY or AMDY?

AZYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AZYY or AMDY?

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 76.77%, compared with 53.96% for AZYY.

What is the main difference between AZYY and AMDY?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AZYY and 1.23% for AMDY.