PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWMIX vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AWMIX vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Fund (AWMIX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AWMIX having a 9.87% return and VO slightly higher at 10.36%. Over the past 10 years, AWMIX has underperformed VO with an annualized return of 9.20%, while VO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.93% annualized return.


AWMIX

1D
0.15%
1M
4.12%
YTD
9.87%
6M
8.24%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
8.73%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
9.20%

VO

1D
-0.85%
1M
2.16%
YTD
10.36%
6M
9.10%
1Y
17.71%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
11.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWMIX vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AWMIX
CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Fund
9.87%2.14%4.16%19.63%-23.66%19.86%18.38%34.57%-6.76%20.87%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
10.36%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between AWMIX and VO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2014

0.94

The correlation between AWMIX and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWMIX vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWMIX
AWMIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
AWMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
AWMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWMIX vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Fund (AWMIX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AWMIXVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.24

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

2.18

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.28

8.21

-4.93

AWMIX vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWMIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWMIX and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AWMIX vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWMIX drawdown since its inception was -37.53%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWMIX and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AWMIXVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.53%

-58.87%

+21.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-8.17%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.10%

-19.02%

-9.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

-27.57%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.53%

-39.37%

+1.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-1.29%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-7.85%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

2.16%

+1.02%

Volatility

AWMIX vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Fund (AWMIX) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.46%. This indicates that AWMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AWMIXVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

4.46%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

9.84%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

12.81%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.01%

17.66%

+2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.28%

18.93%

+1.35%

AWMIX vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWMIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AWMIX vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

AWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.24%, more than VO's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWMIX
CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Fund
10.24%11.25%0.00%4.34%1.57%10.46%2.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.34%0.09%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.36%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AWMIX and VO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AWMIX has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to VO (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWMIX dropped -37.53% vs VO's -58.87%.

VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWMIX and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer