AWMIX vs. VO
AWMIX (CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Fund) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both funds - AWMIX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by CIBC Private Wealth Management, while VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, AWMIX returned 9.20%/yr vs 11.93%/yr for VO. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AWMIX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
AWMIX vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AWMIX having a 9.87% return and VO slightly higher at 10.36%. Over the past 10 years, AWMIX has underperformed VO with an annualized return of 9.20%, while VO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.93% annualized return.
AWMIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 9.87%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
VO
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 17.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
AWMIX vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWMIX CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Fund | 9.87% | 2.14% | 4.16% | 19.63% | -23.66% | 19.86% | 18.38% | 34.57% | -6.76% | 20.87% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.36% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWMIX and VO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2014 | 0.94 |
The correlation between AWMIX and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWMIX vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
AWMIX
VO
AWMIX vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Fund (AWMIX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AWMIX | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.24 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 2.18 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | 8.21 | -4.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AWMIX vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWMIX drawdown since its inception was -37.53%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWMIX and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWMIX | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.53% | -58.87% | +21.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -8.17% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.10% | -19.02% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.81% | -27.57% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.53% | -39.37% | +1.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -1.29% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -7.85% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 2.16% | +1.02% |
Volatility
AWMIX vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Fund (AWMIX) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.46%. This indicates that AWMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWMIX | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 4.46% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | 9.84% | +2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.53% | 12.81% | +2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 17.66% | +2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 18.93% | +1.35% |
AWMIX vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWMIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
AWMIX vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
AWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.24%, more than VO's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWMIX CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Fund | 10.24% | 11.25% | 0.00% | 4.34% | 1.57% | 10.46% | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.34% | 0.09% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, AWMIX and VO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AWMIX has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to VO (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWMIX dropped -37.53% vs VO's -58.87%.
VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AWMIX and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer